McNamee, Cheryl v. United States of America

Filing 17

ORDER construing petitioner Cheryl McNamee's 5/15/13 letter (dkt. 11 -2) as a request for extension of time and granting the extension. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 7/1/13. (rep)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, ORDER Plaintiff, 13-cv-10-bbc v. CHERYL McNAMEE, Defendant. Defendant Cheryl McNamee filed an appeal of the February 28, 2013 order denying her motion for post conviction relief. The motion did not reach the court until May 23, 2013, 88 days after entry of judgment on the motion. Included with the filing was a letter dated May 15, 2013, in which defendant said that she had mailed her appeal papers on May 3, 2013, but had used the wrong address for the court and the papers had not been returned to her until May 14, 2013. In the May 24, 2013 order transmitting her appeal to the court of appeals, I noted that the appeal seemed to be untimely but that it was up to the court of appeals to make that decision. In an order entered June 27,2013, the court construed defendant's May 15,2013 letter as a motion for extension of time in which to file her appeal and asked this court to act on the motion. Under Fed. R. App. P. 4(a)(5), a district court may extend the time to file a notice of 1 .l . ,_.,, il;~ ,,, ~~- f appeal if the party seeking to appeal files a request for an extension within 30 days after the time for filing the appeal has expired. I will construe defendant's cover letter as a request for an extension of time in which to file her notice of appeal and will grant the request. ORDER IT IS ORDERED that defendant Cheryl McNamee's May 15, 2013 letter to the court, dkt. #11-2, is construed as a request for an extension of time and is GRANTED. Entered this 1st day of July, 2013. BY THE COURT: Is/ BARBARA B. CRABB District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?