Flores, Xavier v. NYS Department of Labor
ORDER on ifp request: Complaint taken under advisement for screening. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 3/4/2013. (jef),(ps)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
NYS DEPARTMENT OF LABOR,
HARP TWINS MANAGEMENT,
Plaintiff Xavier Flores has filed two proposed civil complaints. Plaintiff has asked for
leave to proceed in forma pauperis and has supported his request with an affidavit of indigency.
The standard for determining whether plaintiff qualifies for indigent status is the following:
From plaintiff’s annual gross income, the court subtracts $3700 for each
dependent excluding the plaintiff.
If the balance is less than $16,000, the plaintiff may proceed without any
prepayment of fees and costs.
If the balance is greater than $16,000 but less than $32,000, the plaintiff must
prepay half the fees and costs.
If the balance is greater than $32,000, the plaintiff must prepay all fees and costs.
Substantial assets or debts require individual consideration.
In this case, plaintiff’s monthly income is $0.00. He has no dependents and no assets.
Because plaintiff’s income is less than $16,000, he can proceed without any prepayment of fees
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff’s complaints are taken under advisement.
As soon as the court’s calendar permits, plaintiff’s complaints will be screened pursuant to 28
U.S.C. § 1915 to determine whether the cases must be dismissed either because the complaint
is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted or seeks monetary
relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief. Plaintiff will be notified promptly
when such a decision has been made. In the meantime, if plaintiff needs to communicate with
the court about these cases, he should be sure to write the case number shown above on his
Entered this 4th day of March, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
s/ Peter Oppeneer
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?