Ajala, Mustafa-El et al v. West, Kelli et al
Filing
4
ORDER on ifp request: Plaintiff Ajala's $19.59 initial partial filing fee, Brown's trust fund account statement and plaintiffs' response regarding prosecuting this case jointly order due 4/17/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 3/26/2013. (jef),(ps)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
_________________________________________________________________________________________
MUSTAFA-EL K.A. AJALA
f.k.a. Dennis E. Jones-El, and
SPENCER A. BROWN,
v.
Plaintiffs,
ORDER
13-cv-184-bbc
KELLI WEST, AMY SMITH,
RICK RAEMISCH, TODD OVERBO,
CATHY JESS, HUIBREGTSE,
GARY HAMBLIN, TIM HAINES,
CHARLES COLE, STEVE CASPERSON,
GARY BOUGHTON and ANTHONY BROADBENT,
Defendants.
__________________________________________________________________________________
This is a proposed civil action brought by two plaintiffs, Mustafa-El K.A. Ajala, who is a
prisoner at Wisconsin Secure Program Facility in Boscobel, Wisconsin and Spencer Brown, who
is a prisoner at Green Bay Correctional Institution in Green Bay, Wisconsin. Plaintiffs allege
violations of their constitutional rights. Each plaintiff has filed a request for leave to proceed in
forma pauperis. A decision on the requests will be delayed until each plaintiff makes an initial
partial payment of the $350 filing fee and until each plaintiff confirms that he wishes to
prosecute his action jointly, knowing the consequences of doing so.
First, although plaintiffs have joined their claims in one complaint, each is bringing an
action subject to the 1996 Prison Litigation Reform Act and each must pay the full $350 fee for
filing the action. Boriboune v. Berge, 381 F.3d at 856 (7th Circ. 2004). Before this court can
screen the complaint, each plaintiff will have to pay an initial partial payment of the fee pursuant
to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b) and is responsible for paying the remainder of the fee in installments
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(2).
In addition, if the court finds that the entire action is legally frivolous (meaning
completely without merit) or malicious or that it fails to state a claim upon which relief may be
granted, the court will be required to record a strike under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(g) against each
plaintiff named in the caption of the action. (A litigant who incurs a total of three strikes for
filing meritless actions cannot file in forma pauperis in any case except one in which he alleges that
he is in immediate danger.)
Each plaintiff will be held legally responsible for knowing precisely what is being filed in
the case on his behalf and will be subject to sanctions under Fed. R. Civ. P. 11 for any pleading,
motion or other paper filed over his name if such sanctions are found warranted in any aspect
of the case.
Finally, in screening the complaint, the court will consider whether the action of one
plaintiff should be severed from the action of the other plaintiff and, if it decides severance is
appropriate, the plaintiff bringing the severed action will be required to prosecute his claims in
a separate lawsuit.
Because plaintiffs may not have been aware of the consequences of joining their claims
in one lawsuit, I will give each an opportunity to withdraw from the suit. Any plaintiff who does
not withdraw will be required to make an initial partial payment of the $350 fee for filing the
action whether he prosecutes the case separately or with other plaintiffs.
From plaintiff Ajala’s trust fund account statement, I conclude that he must pay $19.59
as an initial partial payment of the $350 fee for filing his complaint. If he does not have the
money to make the initial partial payment in his regular account, he will have to arrange with
prison authorities to pay some or all of the assessment from his release account.
2
An initial partial payment cannot be calculated at this time for plaintiff Brown because
he has not submitted the necessary trust account statement. The complaint in this case was
submitted on March 14, 2013. Therefore, plaintiff Brown’s trust fund account statement should
cover the six-month period beginning approximately September 14, 2012 and ending
approximately March 14, 2013. Once plaintiff Brown has submitted the necessary statement,
I will calculate his initial partial payment and advise him the amount he will have to pay before
the court can screen the merits of the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2).
Should a plaintiff choose to withdraw from the lawsuit, he will not have to pay the $350
filing fee. Similarly, should a plaintiff fail to respond to this order, he will be considered to have
withdrawn from the lawsuit and he will not have to pay the filing fee.
ORDER
IT IS ORDERED that
1.
Each plaintiff may have until April 17, 2013, in which to advise the court whether
he wishes to prosecute this action jointly.
2.
If plaintiffs decide to proceed with the action,
a.
Plaintiff Mustafa-el K.A. Ajala may have until April 17, 2013, in which to
submit a check or money order made payable to the clerk of court in the
amount of $19.59.
b.
Plaintiff Spencer Brown may have until April 17, 2013, in which to submit
a trust fund account statement for the period beginning September 14,
2012 and ending approximately March 14, 2013.
3
3.
If, by April 17, 2013, any plaintiff fails to respond to this order as directed, that
plaintiff will be considered to have withdrawn from the lawsuit voluntarily and
will be dismissed from the case without being charged any portion of the $350
filing fee.
Entered this 26th day of March, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
/s/
PETER OPPENEER
Magistrate Judge
4
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?