Blanck, Walter v. Mil. FBI et al
Filing
95
ORDER directing the clerk of court to set a preliminary pretrial conference before Magistrate Judge Stephen Crocker to set the schedule for the remainder of the proceedings in these lawsuits. Plaintiff's "Motion & Sworn Statement, Etc. for Relief from Imminent Danger, Etc.," Dkt. 94 in case no. 13-cv-193-jdp and Dkt. 40 in case no. 14-cv-135-jdp, is DENIED without prejudice. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 6/2/2016. (jef),(ps)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
WALTER BLANCK,
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
WARDEN BAENEN, DR. SUMNICHT,
NURSE LEMON, SGT. LAUFENBERG,
SUPERVISOR BEVERLY, and
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER MCDONALD,
13-cv-193-jdp
Defendants.
WALTER BLANCK,
Plaintiff,
v.
CORRECTIONAL OFFICER VERDEGEN,
ORDER
14-cv-135-jdp
Defendant.
Plaintiff Walter Blanck is a prisoner at the Green Bay Correctional Institution. In case
no. 13-cv-193-jdp, plaintiff brings Eighth Amendment deliberate indifference and First
Amendment retaliation claims against defendant prison officials for failing to properly treat
his heart and lung disease and severe arthritis, and for intentionally keeping him in hot
conditions that exacerbate his problems. In case no. 14-cv-135-jdp, plaintiff brings claims
that defendant Correctional Officer Verdegen failed to protect him from assault and
encouraged assaults against him. I stayed the ’193 case pending recruitment of counsel. See
Dkt. 79 in the ’193 case. Although I concluded that it was not necessary to recruit counsel to
assist plaintiff with his relatively straightforward claims in the ’135 case, I stayed that case as
well pending recruitment of counsel in the ’193 case so that recruited counsel could
determine whether he or she would be amendable to representing plaintiff in both matters.
Id.
Previously recruited counsel was allowed to withdraw after discovering a conflict. See
Dkt. 92 & 93. Now the court has located new counsel for plaintiff. Michael P. Crooks and
Brittany R. Pierick of the law firm Peterson, Johnson & Murray, S.C. have agreed to
represent plaintiff, with the understanding that they will serve with no guarantee of
compensation for their services.
It is this court’s intention that the scope of these attorneys’ representation extends to
proceedings in this court only.1 If plaintiff decides at some point not to work with these
lawyers, he is free to end the representation, but plaintiff should be aware that it is unlikely
that the court will recruit other lawyers to represent him. A preliminary pretrial conference
will be scheduled, at which time a schedule for the remainder of both of plaintiff’s cases will
be set. After meeting with plaintiff, his attorneys should inform the court whether they will
be taking on representation of plaintiff in both cases. If not, plaintiff will have to litigate that
case himself.
Plaintiff himself has filed a document in both of these cases titled “Motion & Sworn
Statement, Etc. for Relief from Imminent Danger, Etc.” in which he discusses ongoing
retaliatory actions by prison staff. Now that new counsel has been located, I will deny this
motion without prejudice. Counsel or plaintiff (if he goes unrepresented in the ’135 case) are
free to bring a motion for preliminary injunctive relief after meeting with each other.
1
“Proceedings in this court” include all matters leading up to a final judgment on the merits,
the filing of a notice of appeal, if appropriate, and ensuring that all steps are taken to transfer
the record to the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit.
2
ORDER
IT IS ORDERED that:
1.
The clerk of court is directed to set a preliminary pretrial conference before
Magistrate Judge Stephen Crocker to set the schedule for the remainder of the
proceedings in these lawsuits.
2.
Plaintiff’s “Motion & Sworn Statement, Etc. for Relief from Imminent Danger,
Etc.,” Dkt. 94 in case no. 13-cv-193-jdp and Dkt. 40 in case no. 14-cv-135-jdp,
is DENIED without prejudice.
Entered June 2, 2016.
BY THE COURT:
/s/
________________________________________
JAMES D. PETERSON
District Judge
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?