Out RAGE LLC v. New Archery Products Corporation

Filing 81

ORDER granting 70 Motion for Redaction of Preliminary Injunction Hearing Transcript. The redacted version filed by defendant may be made available to the public on CM-ECF. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 8/16/13. (rep)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - OUT RAGE, LLC, ORDER Plaintiff, 13-cv-240-bbc v. NEW ARCHERY PRODUCTS CORPORATION, Defendant. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Through an oversight, I failed to address defendant New Archery Products Corporation’s motion for redaction of the preliminary injunction hearing transcript, dkt. #70. Having reviewed the motion and the transcript, I am granting the motion in its entirety over plaintiff’s objections to three portions of defendant’s request (203:22-204:18, 208:1-10 and 214:13-19). At the same time that defendant filed its motion, it filed a redacted transcript. That transcript can be made available to the public, now that the 90 days has passed since the official transcript was filed. ORDER IT IS ORDERED that defendant New Archery Products Corporation’s motion for redaction of the preliminary injunction hearing transcript, dkt. #70, is GRANTED and that 1 the redacted version filed by defendant as part of its motion may be made available to the public on CM-ECF. Entered this 16th day of August, 2013. BY THE COURT: /s/ BARBARA B. CRABB District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?