Drefahl, William v. Colvin, Carolyn

Filing 34

ORDER granting 28 Motion for Attorney Fees under the EAJA. Plaintiff awarded attorney fees in the amount of $ 9,238.13. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 1/7/15. (jat)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - WILLIAM DREFAHL, ORDER Plaintiff, 13-cv-244-bbc v. CAROLYN W. COLVIN, Acting Commissioner of Social Security, Defendant. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - David Traver, counsel for plaintiff William Drefahl has moved for authorization of an award of attorney fees for his work representing plaintiff in this social security proceeding. Counsel is seeking $9,238.13 under the Equal Access to Justice Act, 28 U.S.C. 2412, in full satisfaction of any claim for fees and costs in this case. The Commissioner does not oppose counsel’s request; however she wants to ensure that in the event that plaintiff owes a pre-existing debt to the United States, that debt may offset plaintiff’s attorney fees under Astrue v. Ratliff, 130 S.Ct. 2521 (2010). After entry of this order, if counsel for the parties can verify that plaintiff owes no pre-existing debt subject to offset, defendant will direct that the award be made payable to plaintiff's counsel under the EAJA assignment signed by plaintiff and his counsel. 1 ORDER IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff William Drefahl’s motion for attorney fees and costs in the amount of $9,238.13, dkt. 28, is GRANTED. This amount is to be made payable to plaintiff's attorney, David Traver contingent upon payment of money owed to the United States. Entered this 7th day of January, 2015. BY THE COURT: /s/ BARBARA B. CRABB District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?