Pride, Charles v. City of Eagle River, Wisconsin et al

Filing 48

ORDER denying plaintiff's 47 motion for Circuit time enlargement for court cost fee payment for lack of jurisdiction. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 3/11/15. (jef),(ps)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHARLES PRIDE, Plaintiff, ORDER v. 13-cv-308-bbc CITY OF EAGLE RIVER, WISCONSIN, JEFF HYSLOP, FRED INTERMUEHLE, JOE LAUX, JERRY BURKET, GEORGE MEADOWS, KIM SCHAFFER, CAROL HENDRICK, DEB BROWN, EAGLE RIVER LIGHT AND WATER, LARRY PHIFER, LON BUSHEY, PAT WEBER, EAGLE RIVER PUBLIC WORKS DEPARTMENT, JOE TOMLANOVICH, MIKE ADAMOVICH, MIDSTATE ENGINEERING, SCOTT MARTIN, BLACKHAWK ENGINEERING, GREG HUZA;STEVE GARBOWICZ, JOHN NIEBURH, JOE RATH and JERRI RADTKE, Defendants. Plaintiff Charles Pride has filed a document entitled “RE: District case no. 13 CV 308 and appeal no. 13-3388 Motion for Circuit Time enlargement for court cost fee payment.” It appears from what he has submitted that he wants this court to correct what he calls the Circuit Clerk error in not docketing his motion for an enlargement of time in which to file his notice of appeal and depriving him of a judicial determination of his motion. Plaintiff has chosen the wrong court in which to seek correction of an alleged error 1 by the court of appeals. In the judicial hierarchy, a circuit court ranks above a district court. This means that the circuit court may correct a district court, but a district court cannot correct the court of appeals. This court has no jurisdiction to correct the error of which plaintiff is complaining. ORDER IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff Charles Pride’s motion for “Circuit Time enlargment for court cost fee payment” is DENIED for lack of jurisdiction. Entered this 11th day of March, 2015. BY THE COURT: /s/ BARBARA B.CRABB District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?