Pride, Charles v. City of Eagle River, Wisconsin et al
Filing
48
ORDER denying plaintiff's 47 motion for Circuit time enlargement for court cost fee payment for lack of jurisdiction. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 3/11/15. (jef),(ps)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - CHARLES PRIDE,
Plaintiff,
ORDER
v.
13-cv-308-bbc
CITY OF EAGLE RIVER, WISCONSIN,
JEFF HYSLOP, FRED INTERMUEHLE,
JOE LAUX, JERRY BURKET, GEORGE
MEADOWS, KIM SCHAFFER,
CAROL HENDRICK, DEB BROWN,
EAGLE RIVER LIGHT AND WATER,
LARRY PHIFER, LON BUSHEY,
PAT WEBER, EAGLE RIVER PUBLIC
WORKS DEPARTMENT, JOE
TOMLANOVICH, MIKE ADAMOVICH,
MIDSTATE ENGINEERING, SCOTT
MARTIN, BLACKHAWK ENGINEERING,
GREG HUZA;STEVE GARBOWICZ, JOHN
NIEBURH, JOE RATH and JERRI RADTKE,
Defendants.
Plaintiff Charles Pride has filed a document entitled “RE: District case no. 13 CV 308
and appeal no. 13-3388 Motion for Circuit Time enlargement for court cost fee payment.”
It appears from what he has submitted that he wants this court to correct what he calls the
Circuit Clerk error in not docketing his motion for an enlargement of time in which to file
his notice of appeal and depriving him of a judicial determination of his motion.
Plaintiff has chosen the wrong court in which to seek correction of an alleged error
1
by the court of appeals. In the judicial hierarchy, a circuit court ranks above a district court.
This means that the circuit court may correct a district court, but a district court cannot
correct the court of appeals. This court has no jurisdiction to correct the error of which
plaintiff is complaining.
ORDER
IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff Charles Pride’s motion for “Circuit Time enlargment
for court cost fee payment” is DENIED for lack of jurisdiction.
Entered this 11th day of March, 2015.
BY THE COURT:
/s/
BARBARA B.CRABB
District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?