Ultratec, Inc. et al v. Sorenson Communications, Inc. et al

Filing 688

JUDGMENT in favor of CapTel, Inc., Ultratec, Inc. against CaptionCall, LLC, Sorenson Communications, Inc. in the amount of $ 44,126,822.00. (BBC /PAO). (jat)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
Ultratec, Inc. and CapTel, Inc.
JUDGMENT

Plaintiffs,

IN A CIVIL CASE

Case No. 13-cv-346-bbc

v.
Sorenson Communications,
and CaptionCall, LLC

Inc.

Defendants.

This action came before the court and a jury with U.S. District Judge Barbara B.
Crabb presiding. The issues have been tried and the jury has rendered its verdict.

IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is entered in favor of
plaintiffs on the Jury Verdict of Liability with respect to infringement of claims 6 of the
'482 patent, claims 1 and 2 of the '314 patent, claim 1 of the '346 patent, claims 7 and
8 of the '835 patent, claim 2 of the '740 patent and claim 2 of the '104 patent.
Damages are awarded in the amount of $44,126,822.00.
On October 23, 2014, the Court granted defendants' motion for judgment of no
willful infringement as a matter of law.
On October 1, 2014, the Court dismissed plaintiffs' claims that defendants
induced infringement of claims 1-8 of the '835 patent and claim 2 of the '740 patent.
On August 28,2014, the Court granted partial summary judgmentin favor of
plaintiffs with respect to: direct infringement of claim 1 of the' 482 patent, claims 7 and
8 of the '578 patent and claim 1 of the '082 patent; nonanticipation of the '082, '740
and' 578 patents by the '835 patent (Engelke '685); nonanticipation of the '314, '835,
'740, '104 and '578 patents by the McLaughlin and Liebermann references;
nonanticipation of the patents-in-suit by the Engelke' 482 (the' 482 patent), Wycherly,
Vasile, Gopalakrishnan, Bowater, Sharman and Engelke '405 references; invalidity of
claims 3-6,8 and 10-29 of the '801 patent; and defendants' counterclaim of breach of
contract.

Page 2

Judgment in a Civil Case

On August 28, 2014, the Court granted partial summary judgment in favor of
defendants with respect to plaintiffs' claims of literal infringement of claim 2 of the' 104
patent; contributory infringement; and pre-suit damages for the '082, '104 and '314
patents.

. 1~
Approved as to form thls~day

of October, 2014.

~~fI-.L~
t2, ~
Barbara B. Crabb, U.S. District Judge

~~CJ
Peter Oppeneer, ~

If

&/1 tf

,

J

Date