Roberts, Kenneth v. McCulloch, Deb
Filing
31
ORDER denying 29 Motion for Reconsideration. Petitioner must prepay $33.03 of the $505 appellate filing fee as a condition of proceeding on appeal in forma pauperis no later than December 9, 2014. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 11/18/2014. (jef),(ps)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
KENNETH A. ROBERTS,
v.
Petitioner,
ORDER
13-cv-446-jdp
DEB McCULLOCH,
Respondent.
Petitioner Kenneth A. Roberts is a patient civilly committed at the Sand Ridge Secure
Treatment Center pursuant to Chapter 980 of the Wisconsin Statutes. On August 13, 2014,
I denied Roberts’s petition for a writ of habeas corpus under 28 U.S.C. § 2254 after
determining that he failed to show that his due process rights were violated by the state
courts. Petitioner filed a notice of appeal and requested leave to proceed in forma pauperis. In a
September 18, 2014 order, I concluded that petitioner was required to submit a resident
account statement so I could assess him an initial partial payment of the $505 appellate filing
fee.
Currently before the court is petitioner’s motion for reconsideration of that
determination. In his motion, petitioner argues that because is not a prisoner subject to the
Prison Litigation Reform Act, he should not have to prepay any portion of the appellate filing
fee. Although petitioner is correct that the PLRA does not apply to him, this court’s policy of
calculating an initial partial payment of filing fees for non-prisoners attempting to proceed in
forma pauperis in cases such as this has long been approved by the Court of Appeals for the
Seventh Circuit. Longbehn v. United States, 169 F.3d 1082, 1083 (7th Cir. 1999) (“Partial-
payment requirements remain appropriate even when the PLRA does not apply—perhaps
because the plaintiff is not a prisoner, perhaps because the suit is not a ‘civil action’ and
therefore is outside the PLRA even when the litigant is a prisoner.”). Accordingly, I will deny
petitioner’s motion for reconsideration.
Notwithstanding petitioner’s motion, he has submitted a resident account statement.
From the financial information in that statement, I conclude that petitioner qualifies for
indigent status and owes $33.03 as the initial partial payment of the $505 appellate filing
fee. Petitioner should show a copy of this order to institution officials to make sure they are
aware that they should send petitioner’s initial partial payment to this court.
ORDER
IT IS ORDERED that:
1.
Petitioner Kenneth A. Roberts’s motion for reconsideration of the court’s
September 18, 2014 order, Dkt. 29, is DENIED.
2.
Petitioner must prepay $33.03 of the $505 appellate filing fee as a condition of
proceeding on appeal in forma pauperis no later than December 9, 2014. If petitioner fails to
make the required payment or show cause for his failure to do so by this deadline, I will
advise the court of appeals of his noncompliance in paying the assessed amount so that it
may take whatever steps it deems appropriate with respect to this appeal.
2
3.
The clerk of court is directed to ensure that the court’s financial records reflect
petitioner’s obligation to pay the $33.03 initial partial payment and the remainder of the
$505 fee.
Entered this 18th day of November, 2014.
BY THE COURT:
/s/
_________________________
JAMES D. PETERSON
District Judge
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?