United States of America v. RMI Management Corporation

Filing 10

DEFAULT JUDGMENT entered in favor of the United States of America against RMI Management Corporation in the amount of $40,748.77 plus interest in accordance with 26 U.S.C. § 6621 from July 26, 2011 for RMI's failure to honor the Intern al Revenue Service Notice of Levy served on July 26, 2011; further ordered and adjudged that DEFAULT JUDGMENT is entered in favor of the United States of America against RMI Management Corporation in the amount of $20,374.38 for a penalty pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 6332(d)(2). (BBC/PAO) (arw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN UNITED STATES OF AMERICA Plaintiff, v. RMI MANAGEMENT CORPORATION, Defendant. ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) ) CASE NO. 3:13·cv·00466·bbc JUDGMENT Pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 6332(d)(I), judgment is hereby entered in favor of the United States and against defendant RMI Management Corporation ("RMI") in the amount of $40,748.77, plus interest in accordance with 26 U.S.C. § 6621 from July 26,2011, for RMI's failure to honor the Internal Revenue Service Notice of Levy served on July 26, 2011 regarding Philip A. Walters' 2001 and 2007 federal income tax liabilities. Judgment is also entered in favor of the United States and against defendant RMI in the amount of$20,374.38 for a penalty pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 6332(d)(2). IT IS FURTHER ORDERED, ADJUDGED AND DECREED, pursuant to 26 U.S.C. § 6332(d)(l), defendant RMI is liable to the United States for an additional $715.80 for each pay period after August 30,2013 that Philip A. Walters earns income from RMI until the levy is released. With the exception of the above penalty amount of $20,374.38, the sum paid by RMI to the IRS shall not exceed $59,178.18, plus accrued interest as of September 13, 2013 in accordance with 26 U.S.C. § 6621. Dated this~~ay of6 ee~ 2013. BARBARA B. CRABB UNITED STATES DISTRICT JUDGE Judgment entered thiS.1i:4- day of September, 2013. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?