Fenne, Eric v. Tegels, Lizzie
Filing
6
ORDER that petitioner Eric B. Fenne may have until September 10, 2013 in which to advise the court in writing that he intends to pursue this case and to explain why he has a claim to any further correction of his sentence. If petitioner fails to respond to this order, his petition will be dismissed. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 8/27/2013. (jef),(ps)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - ERIC B. FENNE,
ORDER
Petitioner,
13-cv-485-bbc
v.
LIZZIE A. TEGELS,
Respondent.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - On June 10, 2013, petitioner Eric B. Fenne filed a petition for a writ of habeas corpus
pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254, contending that he had been sentenced improperly as a
repeater in the Circuit Court for Dane County in case no. 2011CF000105. My review of
the Wisconsin Court System Circuit Court Access online indicates that petitioner is not the
only person who believes that his sentence was improper. In fact, it appears that on July 11,
2013, petitioner’s attorney moved to modify petitioner’s sentence on the ground that the
repeater allegation could not be charged and considered at sentencing and the trial court
agreed and modified petitioner’ s sentence.
It does not seem that petitioner has any remaining claim that he could raise in this
court. Unless petitioner shows the court otherwise and does so no later than September 10,
2013, this petition will be dismissed.
1
ORDER
IT IS ORDERED that petitioner Eric B. Fenne may have until September 10, 2013
in which to advise the court in writing that he intends to pursue this case and to explain why
he has a claim to any further correction of his sentence. If petitioner fails to respond to this
order, his petition will be dismissed.
Entered this 27th day of August, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
/s/
BARBARA B. CRABB
District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?