Noll, Anthony v. Weltman Weinberg & Reis Co. LPA et al
Filing
23
ORDER granting 22 Motion for Agreed Motion for 502 Order. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 11/21/2013. (voc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
Anthony Noll, on behalf of plaintiff and the class )
members described below,
)
)
Plaintiff,
)
)
v.
)
)
Weitman Weinberg & Reis Co. LPA and U.S.
Bank National Association ND,
)
Defendants.
)
)
Case No. 3:13cv551 BBC
Judge: Barbara Crabb
~
JOINT AGREED FED.R.EVID. 502(D) ORDER
Pursuant to Fed.R.Evid. 502(d), the parties hereby stipulate to the entry of the following
Fed.R.Evid. 502(d) order ("Order").
1.
For the purposes of this Order, the following definitions shall apply:
An "inadvertently produced document" or "inadvertent production" is a document
or electronically stored infonnation ("ESI") that a party to this litigation provides
to the opposing party in this case but that should have been withheld by the
Producing Party, in whole or in part, based on a claim of privilege, work-product
protection, confidentiality, or other restrictions on disclosure, and for which the
Producing Party provides the notice required in this Order.
The "Producing Party" is the party that provides an inadvertently produced
document.
The "Receiving Party" is a party that receives an inadvertently produced
document.
2.
Pursuant to the agreement of the parties under Fed. R. Evid. 502(e) and by Order
of this Court under Fed. R. Evid. 502(d), no disclosure, production, or exchange of documents or
infonnation in this case shall constitute a waiver of any applicable privilege or of any applicable
work-product protection in this or any other federal or state proceeding. This Order applies to
any documents or ESI disclosed, exchanged, produced, or discussed, whether intentionally or
l30666697vl 0949816
inadvertently, among the parties, their counsel and/or any agents (such as vendors and experts) in
the course of this litigation.
3.
This Order applies regardless of whether the documents or ESI describe or relate
to actions taken in this litigation, or in prior or separate litigations.
4.
Upon learning of an inadvertent production, the Producing Party shall promptly
give all counsel of record notice of the inadvertent production. The notice shall identify the
document or ESI, the portions of the document or ESI that were inadvertently produced, and the
first date the document or ESI was produced. If the Party that produced a document or ESI
claims that only a portion of the document or ESI was inadvertently produced, the Party shall
provide, with the notice of inadvertent production a new copy of the document or ESI with the
allegedly privileged portions redacted.
5.
Upon receiving notice of an inadvertent production or upon determining that a
document or ESI received is known to be privileged, the Receiving Party must promptly return,
sequester or destroy the specified information and any copies it has, and shall destroy any notes
that 'reproduce, copy, or otherwise disclose the substance of the privileged information. The
Receiving Party may not use or disclose the information until the claim is resolved. If the
Receiving Party disclosed the information before being notified, it must take reasonable steps to
retrieve and prevent further use or distribution of such information until the claim is resolved.
6.
A Party receiving documents or ESI produced by another Party is under a good-
faith obligation to promptly alert the Producing Party if a document or ESI appears on its face or
in light of facts known to the Receiving Party to be privileged.
2
130666697v1 0949816
7.
To the extent that any Party obtains any infonnation, documents or communications
through inadvertent disclosure, such infonnation, documents, and communications shall not be filed
or presented for admission into evidence or sought in discovery by that Party in any action.
8.
If the Receiving Party challenges a claim that a document or ESI is properly
privileged, the Receiving Party may in connection with a good-faith challenge, make reference to
the contents of the document or ESI in any paper submitted to the Court, so long as such filing is
made under seal. If requested by the Receiving Party, the Producing Party shall provide such
document or ESI to the Court for in~amera review.
9.
If the Court sustains a claim that a produced document or produced ESI is
properly a privileged document or privileged ESI, the Receiving Party shall, within two (2) days
of the Court's order, return the privileged document or privileged ESI and any copies it has,
destroy any notes relating to the privileged document or privileged ESI, and advise the
Producing Party in writing of the return and destruction.
10.
Nothing in this Order shall be construed to require the production of any document or
ESI that a Party contends is protected from disclosure by an applicable privilege and/or the work product doctrine.
The parties, by their respective representatives, hereby agree and stipulate to each of the
terms and conditions as set forth in the foregoing Order.
COURT APPROVAL
SO ORDERED
l?t~ob9~~'J'f-
Dated: ll/Jlj2013
United States J;)istriet J:adg0 -wt "-Cf 15f~ ~ ~
Westem District of Wisconsin
3
130666697vl 0949816
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?