Sanders, Paschall v. Rhodes, Kitty et al
Filing
6
ORDER on ifp request: Plaintiff to submit Trust fund account statement. Trust Fund Account Statement due 10/11/2013. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 9/24/2013. (jef),(ps)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
PASCHALL L. SANDERS,
Plaintiff,
ORDER
13-cv-649-wmc
KITTY RHODES, et al.,
Defendants.
Plaintiff Paschall L. Sanders is currently subject to civil commitment at the Sand Ridge
Secure Treatment Center in Mauston, W isconsin, pursuant to W is. Stat. ch. 980 and Wis. Stat.
§ 51.61.
Sanders has filed a civil action against three administrators with the Wisconsin
Department of Health Services, challenging the denial of his application for benefits under a state
Medicare or Medicaid program. With the exception of habeas corpus proceedings, the fee for civil
actions filed after May 1, 2013 is $400 unless a litigant qualifies as indigent under the federal in
forma pauperis statute, 28 U.S.C. § 1915, in which case the fee is $350. Plaintiff has submitted a
motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. (Dkt. # 5). The court cannot consider this motion,
however, because it lacks information regarding plaintiff’s eligibility for indigent status.
This court uses one formula for determining whether an institutionalized litigant is entitled
to proceed in forma pauperis, even in cases that are not subject to the mandatory fee provisions
found in the Prison Litigation Reform Act (PLRA), 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b). See Longbehn v. United
States, 169 F.3d 1082, 1083-84 (7th Cir. 1999) (approving the district court’s incremental feecollection formula for non-PLRA cases). Under this formula, the court will consider a copy of the
plaintiff’s resident account statement for the six months preceding his complaint, calculating 20%
of the average monthly balance and comparing that amount with 20% of the average monthly
income. The plaintiff will be required to pay whichever amount is greater toward the $400 filing
fee before his case can proceed. Plaintiff qualifies for indigent status with respect to the remainder
of the fee. (The federal in forma pauperis statute does not permit a court to waive plaintiff’s entire
obligation to pay filing fees, but it does allow a qualifying individual to proceed without prepaying
some or all of the filing fee.)
Plaintiff has not provided a certified copy of his resident account statement along with his
motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. He must do so if he intends to pursue his request.
Because plaintiff’s complaint was executed on September 11, 2013, his resident account statement
should cover the preceding six-month period, from the date of the complaint through at least
March 11, 2013. If plaintiff fails to submit the required statement within the deadline set below,
the court will assume he does not wish to proceed with this action and his case will be dismissed.
ORDER
IT IS ORDERED that, no later than October 11, 2013, plaintiff Paschall Sanders shall
submit a certified copy of his resident account statement for the six-month period from the date
of the complaint (September 11, 2013 through at least March 11, 2012). Plaintiff is advised that,
if he fails to comply as directed or show cause of his failure to do so, his case will be dismissed
without further notice pursuant to Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a).
Entered this 24th day of September, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
/s/
PETER OPPENEER
Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?