Byrd, Rose v. Wisconsin Department of Veterans Affairs
ORDER that plaintiff Rose Byrd may have until 5:00 p.m. on May 6, 2015, to supplement her motion to amend the trial schedule. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 5/4/2015. (jef),(ps)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
ROSE M. BYRD,
WISCONSIN DEPARTMENT OF
The trial in this case is set to begin in one week. But plaintiff Rose Byrd has again moved
to adjust the calendar because she has conflicting medical appointments. Dkt. 121-2. Although
Byrd’s latest request provides more information about her need to reschedule than any of her
previous motions did, it is insufficient to justify such a late adjustment to the calendar. I will
afford Byrd a very brief window in which to supplement her request before ruling on the motion
to amend the trial date.
On April 27, 2015, Byrd attended a medical appointment. Dkt. 121-1, at 5-7. As a result
of the appointment, Byrd is now scheduled for a “thoracic and lumbar evaluation on May 8,”
the date of the Final Pretrial Conference. Dkt. 121, ¶ 18. She also has an appointment on May
11, the first day of trial. Both appointments will be in Florida. In light of these conflicts, Byrd
would like to move her trial date back by three months. Dkt. 121-2.
For two reasons, I am disinclined to grant Byrd’s request. First, even though Byrd
scheduled these appointments last week Monday, she waited until Saturday to inform the court
about her conflicts. Second, Byrd has not produced documentation from a medical provider to
demonstrate that these appointments are medically necessary, as opposed to elective. Given the
proximity of trial, the latter is not a sufficient reason for such extreme last-minute changes. I will
not reschedule the trial simply because it would be convenient for Byrd to attend these
appointments; they must be medically necessary.
Byrd may therefore have 48 hours to file a note from her doctor, indicating that her
upcoming appointments are medically necessary and cannot be postponed by a week. If Byrd
fails to provide adequate documentation, then I will deny her motion to amend and this case
will proceed as scheduled. I will entertain a motion from Byrd to appear by phone for the Final
Pretrial Conference, but she must be at the courthouse in person for the first day of trial on May
11. If Byrd fails to appear without a compelling reason for doing so, I will dismiss this case with
prejudice for failure to prosecute.
Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff Rose Byrd may have until 5:00 p.m. on May
6, 2015, to supplement her motion to amend the trial schedule.
Entered May 4, 2015.
BY THE COURT:
JAMES D. PETERSON
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?