United States of America v. Fiberdome, Inc.

Filing 2

ORDER granting 1 Petition for Issuance of OSHA Warrant. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 10/23/2013. (voc)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WE,STERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ESTABLISHMENT INSPECTION OF: Case No. FIBERDOME, INC. 865 Stony Road Lake Mills, WI 53551 l3 - c L! - 1"1'0- 5 l...C.- WARRANT FOR INSPECTION UNDER THE OCCUPATIONAL SAFETY AND HEALTH ACT OF 1970 To: Amanda Kupper and/or any other Compliance Officer(s) of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, United States Department of Labor. Sworn application having been made, reasonable legislative and administrative standards having been prescribed, and probable cause shown by Amanda Kupper of the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, United States Department of Labor, for a safety and health inspection and investigation ofthe workplace described as: FIBERDOME, INC. 865 Stony Road Lake Mills, WI 53551 IT IS HEREBY ORDERED that based on the grounds set forth in the sworn application for inspection warrant and pursuant to section 8(a) of the Occupational Safety and Health Act of 1970 (29 U.S.c. 651, et seg.), hereinafter referred to as the Act, YOU ARE AUTHORIZED to enter the above described premises during regular working hours to conduct an inspection and investigation, and to inspect and investigate in a reasonable manner and to a reasonable extent including but not limited to authority to take environmental samples and to take or obtain photographs and/or videotapes related to the purpose of the inspection and questioning privately any owner, operator, agent, employer or employee of the establishment, workplace or environment where work is performed or permitted to be performed by employees of the employer, specifically limited to the following unsafe work practices, areas and/or conditions alleged in a complaint received by the Occupational Safety and Health Administration, to wit: a. Employees working in the grinding levels of airborne dust. department are exposed to excessive Said inspection and investigation will extend only to the above-referred to alleged hazardous working conditions and/or work areas as well as to any hazardous work areas, procedures and/or working conditions within the plain view of the Compliance Officer(s) during the course of the inspection, and to all pertinent conditions, structures, machines, apparatus, devices, equipment, materials, and all other things therein (including a review of records required by the Act and/or directly related to the purpose of the inspection--such records do not include employee medical records as defined in 29 CFR 1910.1020(c)(6)(i» related to the above-described practices, areas or working conditions and bearing on whether this employer is furnishing to its employees employment and a place of employment which is free from recognized hazards that are causing or are likely to cause death or serious physical harm to its employees, and whether this employer is complying with the occupational safety and health standards promulgated under the Act and the rules, regulations, and orders issued pursuant to the Act. A return shall be made to this Court showing that the inspection has been completed, within twenty-one (21) days from this date. DATED: [0-2)-1) ~ 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.

Why Is My Information Online?