Sean Morrison Entertainment, LLC v. O'Flaherty Heim Egan & Birnbaum, Ltd. et al
Filing
9
ORDER granting 8 Motion to Dismiss defendant Barb Honchak. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 11/27/2013. (voc)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SEAN MORRISON ENTERTAINMENT, LLC,
ORDER
Plaintiff,
13-cv-753-bbc
v.
O’FLAHERTY HEIM EGAN & BIRNBAUM, LTD.,
NICHOLAS D. THOMPSON, HEATHER CLARK,
ANGELA HAYES, BARB HONCHAK,
ANGELA MAGANA, MICHELLE OULD,
PATRICIA VIDONIC and KAITLAN YOUNG,
Defendants.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - In an order dated November 7, 2013, dkt. #5, I directed plaintiff Sean Morrison
Entertainment, LLC, to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of subject
matter jurisdiction. The problem was that plaintiff alleged that both it and defendant Barb
Honchak are citizens of Illinois, but it was relying for subject matter jurisdiction on 28
U.S.C. § 1332, which requires a showing that all of the plaintiffs are citizens of different
states from the defendants. Hart v. FedEx Ground Package Systems, Inc., 457 F.3d 675,
676 (7th Cir. 2006).
In response to the order, plaintiff has moved to dismiss the complaint as to defendant
Honchak. Dkt. #8. Because a plaintiff may dismiss a nondiverse defendant in order to
preserve jurisdiction, Singletary v. Continental Illinois Nationa Bank & Trust Co. of
1
Chicago, 9 F.3d 1236, 1238 (7th Cir. 1993), I will grant plaintiff’s request and allow the
case to proceed.
ORDER
IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff Sean Morrison Entertainment, LLC’s motion to
dismiss the complaint as to defendant Barb Honchak, dkt. #8, is GRANTED.
Entered this 27th day of November, 2013.
BY THE COURT:
/s/
BARBARA B. CRABB
District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?