Sean Morrison Entertainment, LLC v. O'Flaherty Heim Egan & Birnbaum, Ltd. et al

Filing 9

ORDER granting 8 Motion to Dismiss defendant Barb Honchak. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 11/27/2013. (voc)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - SEAN MORRISON ENTERTAINMENT, LLC, ORDER Plaintiff, 13-cv-753-bbc v. O’FLAHERTY HEIM EGAN & BIRNBAUM, LTD., NICHOLAS D. THOMPSON, HEATHER CLARK, ANGELA HAYES, BARB HONCHAK, ANGELA MAGANA, MICHELLE OULD, PATRICIA VIDONIC and KAITLAN YOUNG, Defendants. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - In an order dated November 7, 2013, dkt. #5, I directed plaintiff Sean Morrison Entertainment, LLC, to show cause why this case should not be dismissed for lack of subject matter jurisdiction. The problem was that plaintiff alleged that both it and defendant Barb Honchak are citizens of Illinois, but it was relying for subject matter jurisdiction on 28 U.S.C. § 1332, which requires a showing that all of the plaintiffs are citizens of different states from the defendants. Hart v. FedEx Ground Package Systems, Inc., 457 F.3d 675, 676 (7th Cir. 2006). In response to the order, plaintiff has moved to dismiss the complaint as to defendant Honchak. Dkt. #8. Because a plaintiff may dismiss a nondiverse defendant in order to preserve jurisdiction, Singletary v. Continental Illinois Nationa Bank & Trust Co. of 1 Chicago, 9 F.3d 1236, 1238 (7th Cir. 1993), I will grant plaintiff’s request and allow the case to proceed. ORDER IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff Sean Morrison Entertainment, LLC’s motion to dismiss the complaint as to defendant Barb Honchak, dkt. #8, is GRANTED. Entered this 27th day of November, 2013. BY THE COURT: /s/ BARBARA B. CRABB District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?