Collins, Roy v. Meisner, Michael et al

Filing 2

Initial Order for Paid Pro Se Prisoner: Plaintiff complaint taken under advisement. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 11/7/2013. (jef),(ps)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN _______________________________________________________________________________________ ROY COLLINS, ORDER Plaintiff, v. 13-cv-762-wmc MICHAEL MEISNER, Staff Member BERGLAND Staff Member L. WOGERNESE, Staff Member JOHN DOE and ED WALL, Defendants. _____________________________________________________________________________________ Plaintiff Roy Collins, an inmate at the Columbia Correctional Institution in Portage, Wisconsin filed this case originally in the Circuit Court for Dane County, Wisconsin. On November 6, 2013, defendants removed this action to this court pursuant to 28 U.S.C. §§ 1441 and 1446 and paid the $400 filing fee. However, because plaintiff is a prisoner, he is subject to the 1996 Prison Litigation Reform Act. Under the act, a plaintiff cannot proceed with this action unless the court grants him permission to proceed after screening his complaint pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 1915A. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff Roy Collins’ complaint is taken under advisement. As soon as the court’s calendar permits, plaintiff’s complaint will be screened pursuant to 28 U.S.C.§ 1915A to determine whether the case must be dismissed either because the complaint is frivolous or malicious, fails to state a claim on which relief may be granted or seeks monetary relief against a defendant who is immune from such relief. The parties will be notified promptly when such a decision has been made. In the meantime, if plaintiff needs to communicate with the court about this case, he should be sure to write the case number shown above on his communication. Entered this 7th day of November, 2013. BY THE COURT: /s/ PETER OPPENEER Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?