Koziara, Michael v. BNSF Railway Company
Filing
259
ORDER FOR DISMISSAL with prejudice; Defendant BNSF Railway Company is awarded appellate costs in the amount of $565, in accordance with the mandate and bill of costs from the Court of Appeals; Defendant may file a supported petition to recorve costs by December 30, 2016. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 12/16/2016. (jls)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
MICHAEL KOZIARA,
Plaintiff,
v.
BNSF RAILWAY COMPANY,
ORDER
13-cv-834-jdp
Defendant.
A jury found in favor of plaintiff Michael Koziara on his claim that defendant BNSF
Railway Company retaliated against him for reporting a workplace injury, in violation of the
Federal Rail Safety Act (FRSA). BNSF appealed, Dkt. 238, and the court stayed the
execution of the judgment pending appeal, Dkt. 255, at 15-16. The Court of Appeals for the
Seventh Circuit reversed and instructed this court to dismiss the suit. Dkt. 258. Koziara filed
a petition for rehearing en banc, which the Court of Appeals denied. Dkt. 258-2. The Court
of Appeals then issued its mandate with a bill of costs awarding BNSF its appellate costs in
the amount of $565. Dkt. 258-3.
Accordingly, the court will dismiss this case, with appellate costs, as instructed in the
decision and by the mandate of the Court of Appeals. Dkt. 258; Dkt. 258-1; Dkt. 258-3.
BNSF may also recover costs from this court with a properly supported bill of costs, to be
filed within 14 days.
ORDER
IT IS ORDERED that:
1. This case is DISMISSED with prejudice.
2. Defendant BNSF Railway Company is awarded appellate costs in the amount of
$565, in accordance with the mandate and bill of costs from the Court of Appeals.
3. Defendant may file a supported petition to recover costs by December 30, 2016.
Entered December 16, 2016.
BY THE COURT:
/s/
________________________________________
JAMES D. PETERSON
District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?