Flodin, Daniel v. The United States of America et al

Filing 60

ORDER resetting briefing on 58 Motion for Judgment on the Pleadings. Response due 2/22/2016. There will be no reply; Moving the start date for trial to 3/8/2016 and leaving all other deadlines in place. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 2/8/2016. (jls)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - DANIEL FLODIN, ORDER Plaintiff, 13-cv-853-bbc v. UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Defendant. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Plaintiff Daniel Flodin is suing the government under the Federal Tort Claims Act for negligently failing to prevent his father from falling while at a medical clinic for veterans. Trial is scheduled for March 7, 2016. On February 5, 2016, at approximately 5:00 pm, the government filed an untimely motion for judgment on the pleadings on the ground that the statute of limitations for plaintiff’s claim expired before he filed this case. The government does not provide any reason for missing the deadline for dispositive motions by nearly a year. I will give plaintiff an opportunity to respond to the government’s motion, but the parties should not expect that the motion will be resolved before trial. All deadlines remain in place unless otherwise ordered by this court. In addition, I am moving the trial one day to March 8, 2015, to accommodate a conflict in the court’s schedule. 1 ORDER IT IS ORDERED that 1. Plaintiff Daniel Flodin may have until February 22, 2016, to file a response to the government’s motion for judgment on the pleadings. There will be no reply. 2. The starting trial date is MOVED to March 8, 2016. 3. All other deadlines remain in place. Entered this 8th day of February, 2016. BY THE COURT: /s/ BARBARA B. CRABB District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?