Luce, Gregory et al v. Town of Campbell, Wisconsin et al

Filing 25

ORDER granting 24 Motion for Clarification; denying without prejudice 5 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 3/27/14. (jat)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

GREGORY LUCE and NICHOLAS
NEWMAN,
Plaintiffs,

ORDER

v.
14-cv-046-wmc
TOWN OF CAMPBELL, WISCONSIN,
TIM KELEMEN, and NATHAN CASPER,
Defendants.

At defendants’ request, the court held a status conference today with all parties
appearing by counsel to clarify whether the court intended to hear testimony at the
preliminary injunction hearing scheduled for April 7, 2014.

During the conference,

plaintiffs represented that they needed discovery in order to address representations
made by defendants as to the traffic safety justification for the Town’s adoption of
Ordinance 9.12. Based on this need, coupled with plaintiffs’ failure to comply with the
court’s procedure to be followed on motions for injunctive relief,1 the court will deny
plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction without prejudice to refiling. If plaintiffs
refile, defendants will have thirty days to respond, and the court will schedule a hearing if
needed. Accordingly,
IT IS ORDERED that:
1) Defendants’ motion for clarification (dkt. #24) is GRANTED; and

1

The procedures were docketed in this case on February 25, 2014, and available on the
court’s website at http://www.wiwd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/Injunctive_Relief.pdf.

2) Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction (dkt. #5) is DENIED without
prejudice to refiling.
Entered this 27th day of March, 2014.
BY THE COURT:
/s/
________________________________________
WILLIAM M. CONLEY
District Judge

2