Luce, Gregory et al v. Town of Campbell, Wisconsin et al
ORDER granting 24 Motion for Clarification; denying without prejudice 5 Motion for Preliminary Injunction. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 3/27/14. (jat)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
GREGORY LUCE and NICHOLAS
TOWN OF CAMPBELL, WISCONSIN,
TIM KELEMEN, and NATHAN CASPER,
At defendants’ request, the court held a status conference today with all parties
appearing by counsel to clarify whether the court intended to hear testimony at the
preliminary injunction hearing scheduled for April 7, 2014.
During the conference,
plaintiffs represented that they needed discovery in order to address representations
made by defendants as to the traffic safety justification for the Town’s adoption of
Ordinance 9.12. Based on this need, coupled with plaintiffs’ failure to comply with the
court’s procedure to be followed on motions for injunctive relief,1 the court will deny
plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction without prejudice to refiling. If plaintiffs
refile, defendants will have thirty days to respond, and the court will schedule a hearing if
IT IS ORDERED that:
1) Defendants’ motion for clarification (dkt. #24) is GRANTED; and
The procedures were docketed in this case on February 25, 2014, and available on the
court’s website at http://www.wiwd.uscourts.gov/sites/default/files/Injunctive_Relief.pdf.
2) Plaintiffs’ motion for preliminary injunction (dkt. #5) is DENIED without
prejudice to refiling.
Entered this 27th day of March, 2014.
BY THE COURT:
WILLIAM M. CONLEY
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?