Ultratec, Inc. et al v. Sorenson Communications, Inc. et al

Filing 571

DRAFT Verdict Form for Damages. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 10/6/2015. (AEB)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

ULTRATEC, INC. and CAPTEL, INC.,
Plaintiffs,
SPECIAL VERDICT
FORM – DAMAGES
[OCTOBER 6 DRAFT]
14-cv-66-jdp
v.
SORENSON COMMUNICATIONS, INC. and
CAPTIONCALL, LLC,
Defendants.

We, the jury, for our special verdict, do find as follows:

QUESTION NO. 1: Do you find that the reasonable royalty should include a onetime lump sum payment?

ANSWER: ______________________ (“yes” or “no”)
IF “YES,”
What is the amount of the one-time lump sum payment?
$______________________

QUESTION NO. 2: Do you find that the reasonable royalty should include a perminute running royalty?

ANSWER: ______________________ (“yes” or “no”)
IF “YES,”
What is the royalty rate per minute?
______________________ cents
What is the total number of infringing minutes?
_______________________ minutes
What is the total royalty payment for defendants’ infringement?
$_____________________

__________________________________
Presiding Juror

Madison, Wisconsin
Dated this ___ day of October, 2015