Rowe, Michael v. Trish et al

Filing 55

JUDGMENT entered in favor of defendants dismissing this case. (PAO/jef). (jef),(ps)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MICHAEL CORTEZ ROWE, Plaintiff, v. JUDGMENT IN A CIVIL CASE 14-cv-195-bbc TRISHA ANDERSON, DR. MARTIN, DR. HEINZYL, NURSE JANE DOE, KAREN ANDERSON, TRAVIS HAGG, LT. PITZEN, SGT. HOOPER, C.O. EXNER, PETAR KARNA and DAVID SPANNAGEL, Defendants. This action came for consideration before the court with District Judge Barbara B. Crabb presiding. The issues have been considered and a decision has been rendered. IT IS ORDERED AND ADJUDGED that judgment is entered in favor of defendants: (1) dismissing plaintiff’s claims against defendants Dr. Martin, Dr. Heinzyl, Nurse Jane Doe, Lt. Pitzen, Sgt. Hooper and C.O. Exner for failure to state a claim upon which relief may be granted; and (2) granting Trish Anderson, Karen Anderson, Travis Hagg, Petar Karna and David Spannagel’s motion for summary judgment and dismissing this case. /s/ Peter Oppeneer, Clerk of Court 1/28/2016 Date

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?