Ladd, Allen v. United States of America

Filing 2

ORDER dismissing for lack of jurisdiction 1 Motion to Vacate Sentence per 28 U.S.C. 2255 by Petitioner Allen Ladd. No certificate of appealability shall issue. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 6/17/2014. (arw)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
ORDER
Plaintiff,
05-cr-42-bbc
14-cv-437-bbc

v.
ALLEN LADD,
Defendant.

- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Defendant Allen Ladd has filed a motion for post conviction relief under 28 U.S.C.
§ 2255(f) based upon the Supreme Court decision in Alleyne v. United States, 133 S. Ct.
2151 (2013). He contends he is entitled to a new sentencing because at his original one the
court took into account several factual matters that had not been found by a jury.
Defendant’s motion must be dismissed because this court has no jurisdiction to hear
it. The present motion is defendant’s second motion for relief filed under 28 U.S.C. § 2255.
He filed the first one on December 23, 2008; it was denied on March 17, 2009. He is
prohibited from filing a second motion for post conviction relief unless he first obtains
certification to do so from a panel of the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. §
2255(h).
If defendant wishes to pursue his motion, he will have to persuade the court of
appeals that his motion rests on newly discovered evidence or a new rule of constitutional

1

law, made retroactive to cases on collateral review by the Supreme Court, that was previously
unavailable to him. Id. Unless and until the Supreme Court makes Alleyne retroactive, he
will not be likely to obtain such certification.
It is probably unnecessary to consider the question of issuing a certificate of
appealability. To complete the record, however, I find under Rule 11 of the Rules Governing
Section 2255 Proceedings, that defendant has not made a "substantial showing of the denial
of a constitutional right," 28 U.S.C. § 2253(c)(2); Tennard v. Dretke, 542 U.S. 274, 282
(2004), so no certificate will issue.

ORDER
IT IS ORDERED that defendant Allen Ladd’s motion for post conviction relief under
28 U.S.C. § 2255 is DISMISSED for lack of jurisdiction. No certificate of appealability shall
issue.
Entered this 17th day of June, 2014.
BY THE COURT:
/s/
BARBARA B. CRABB
District Judge

2