Prince, Marvin v. Lloyd, K. et al

Filing 4

Disregard. Modified on 10/10/2014 (jef).

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN MARVIN PRINCE, Plaintiff, ORDER v. Case No. 14-cv-677-jdp MS. K. LLOYD AND MS. K. GEISSLER, Defendants. Plaintiff Marvin Prince, a prisoner in the custody of the Wisconsin Department of Corrections, has filed a proposed civil complaint, but has neither paid the filing fee nor requested leave to proceed without prepayment. For this case to proceed, plaintiff must pay the $400 filing fee or submit a properly supported motion for leave to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee no later than October 29, 2014. A motion for leave to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee must be accompanied by a certified copy of plaintiff’s inmate trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the six-month period immediately preceding the date of the complaint. 28 U.S.C. § 1915(a)(2). If I find that plaintiff is indigent, I will calculate an initial partial payment amount that must be paid before the court can screen the merits of the complaint under 28 U.S.C. § 1915(e)(2). Thereafter, plaintiff will be required to pay the balance of the filing fee in installments. ORDER IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff Marvin Prince may have until October 29, 2014 to submit the $400 filing fee or a motion for leave to proceed without prepayment and a trust fund account statement for the period beginning approximately April 1, 2014 and ending approximately October 1, 2014. If, by October 29, 2014, plaintiff fails to respond to this order, I will assume that plaintiff wishes to withdraw this action voluntarily. In that event, the case will be closed without prejudice to plaintiff filing the case at a later date. Entered this 10th day of October, 2014. BY THE COURT: /s/ PETER OPPENEER Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?