Truly, Gina et al v. State of WI - Division of Housing et al
Filing
11
ORDER directing the clerk of court to unseal the complaint, Dkt. 1 , and the government's declination, Dkt. 10 . The remainder of the court's current docket remains under seal. The seal is lifted for all matters that occur after the date of this order. Relator Gina Truly may have until January 25, 2017, to inform the court whether she wishes to pursue the case, and if she does wish to pursue it, to have an attorney appear on her behalf. Under 31 U.S.C. § 3730(c)(3), the United States shall be served with copies of all further pleadings in this action. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 1/4/2017. (jef),(ps)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA,
ex rel. GINA TRULY,
v.
Plaintiff,
SEALED
ORDER
14-cv-842-jdp
STATE OF WISCONSIN – DIVISION OF
HOUSING AND CITY OF BARABOO CDA,
Defendants.
Pro se plaintiff Gina Truly, a resident of Middleton, Wisconsin, has filed this action
under the False Claims Act, alleging that the city of Baraboo Community Development
Authority received federal loan funds in violation of various federal regulations, allowed loan
funds to go missing, and then, after she reported the violations, retaliated against her by
firing or demoting her. In a previous order, I directed the clerk of court to serve the United
States so that the government could decide whether to intervene in the case. Dkt. 4. The
government has responded, stating that it declines to intervene. Dkt. 10.
Truly, as relator, may still proceed with this lawsuit on behalf of the government.
Usually at this point, I would unseal the complaint and the government’s declination, and
have the relator serve them upon defendants. I will unseal these documents, but Truly should
wait to serve defendants until she responds to the court about two issues.
First, in its response, the government states that Truly has told its representatives that
she does not intend to pursue the case on her own, and that the government does not object
to dismissal so long as it is without prejudice. Second, as I stated in the previous order, Truly
cannot pursue this case as a pro se litigant; she must locate an attorney to represent her.
Accordingly, I will give Truly a short time to respond to this order, explaining whether she
wishes to pursue this case. If she does wish to pursue the case, she has the same deadline to
have an attorney appear on her behalf. If she does not respond to this order, I will dismiss the
case without prejudice.
ORDER
IT IS ORDERED that:
1. The clerk of court is directed to unseal the complaint, Dkt. 1, and the
government’s declination, Dkt. 10. The remainder of the court’s current
docket remains under seal. The seal is lifted for all matters that occur after the
date of this order.
2. Relator Gina Truly may have until January 25, 2017, to inform the court
whether she wishes to pursue the case, and if she does wish to pursue it, to
have an attorney appear on her behalf.
3. Under 31 U.S.C. § 3730(c)(3), the United States shall be served with copies
of all further pleadings in this action.
Entered January 4, 2017.
BY THE COURT:
/s/
JAMES D. PETERSON
District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?