Coleman, Chizuco v. U.S. Trustee's Office et al

Filing 20

ORDER: The bankruptcy appeal is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 3/26/2015. (kwf)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ROBERT COLEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, ORDER v. 14-cv-834-jdp U.S. TRUSTEE’S OFFICE, Defendant-Appellee. CHIZUCO COLEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, ORDER v. 14-cv-835-jdp U.S. TRUSTEE’S OFFICE, Defendant-Appellee. ROBERT COLEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, ORDER v. 14-cv-879-jdp U.S. TRUSTEE’S OFFICE, SPENTA ENTERPRISES, INC., and HOSHANG R. KARANI, Defendants-Appellees. CHIZUCO COLEMAN, Plaintiff-Appellant, ORDER v. 14-cv-880-jdp U.S. TRUSTEE’S OFFICE, SPENTA ENTERPRISES, INC., and HOSHANG R. KARANI, Defendants-Appellees. In each of the above-captioned cases, orders dated March 11, 2015, gave plaintiffs-appellants Robert Coleman and Chizuco Coleman 14 days to inform the court whether they intended to pursue these bankruptcy appeals. The clerk’s office mailed copies of these orders to the Colemans, and to the attorney who is representing them in new bankruptcy petitions filed in the Eastern District of Wisconsin. Each order warned the Colemans that if they did not respond by March 25, the court would dismiss their appeals for failure to prosecute. See Link v. Wabash R.R. Co., 370 U.S. 626, 629-33 (1962) (district courts may sua sponte dismiss an action for failure to prosecute). The deadline for the Colemans’s responses has come and gone, with no word from either of them. Accordingly, IT IS ORDERED that each of the above-captioned bankruptcy appeals is DISMISSED for failure to prosecute. The clerk’s office is directed to close all four cases. Entered March 26, 2015. BY THE COURT: /s/ ________________________________________ JAMES D. PETERSON District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?