Shebelske, Brian v. Marathon County Adult Correction Facility et al

Filing 40

ORDER that Attorney Andrew Erlandson has agreed to represent plaintiff in this matter. The clerk of court is directed to set a telephone conference before Magistrate Judge Stephen Crocker. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 10/15/2015. (elc),(ps)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - BRIAN P. SHEBELSKE, ORDER Plaintiff, 15-cv-072-bbc v. SETH WISKOW, CARRY PELLOWSKE, PRACTIONER THAO and RN THOMAS RALPH, Defendants. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Pro se prisoner Brian Shebelske is proceeding on a claim that officials at the Marathon County jail failed to provide him adequate treatment for his anemia and vitamin deficiency, in violation of his right to due process. In an order dated September 9, 2015, dkt. #39, I concluded that plaintiff was entitled to assistance in recruiting counsel because the complexity of the case exceeded plaintiff's ability to represent himself at trial. Andrew Erlandson of the law firm Hurley, Burish & Stanton, S.C. has agreed to represent plaintiff, with the understanding that he will serve with no guarantee of compensation for his services. It is this court's intention that the scope of representation extends to proceedings in this court only. "Proceedings in this court" include all matters leading up to a final judgment on the merits, the filing of a Notice of Appeal, if appropriate, and ensuring that all steps are taken to transfer the record to the Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. 1 Additionally, the court intends the scope of representation to be limited to litigating plaintiff's current claims. It will be unnecessary for counsel to file an amended complaint or otherwise relitigate matters already completed. Counsel should focus on doing what is necessary to prepare the case for summary judgment and trial. However, if counsel believes that he needs to file an amended complaint, he may make that request at the scheduling conference. Plaintiff should understand that because he is now represented in this case, he may not communicate directly with the court from this point forward. He must work directly with counsel and permit counsel to exercise his professional judgment to determine which matters are appropriate to bring to the court's attention and in what form. Plaintiff does not have the right to require counsel to raise frivolous arguments or to follow every directive he makes. He should be prepared to accept the strategic decisions made by counsel even if he disagrees with some of them. If plaintiff decides at some point not to work with counsel, he is free to end the representation, but he should be aware that it is unlikely that the court will try to recruit another lawyer to represent him. If the parties believe that mediation could help resolve their disputes, they may contact the clerk of court, Peter Oppeneer, for assistance. ORDER IT IS ORDERED that the clerk of court is directed to set a telephone conference before Magistrate Judge Stephen Crocker to set the schedule for the remainder of the 2 proceedings in this lawsuit. Entered this 15th day of October, 2015. BY THE COURT: /s/ BARBARA B. CRABB District Judge 3

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?