Lewis, J. v. Epic Systems Corporation
Transmission of Notice of Appeal, Opinion and Order and Docket Sheet to Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals re: 55 Notice of Appeal, (Attachments: # 1 Opinion and Order, # 2 Docket Sheet) (lak)
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
individually and on behalf of all
others similarly situated,
Case No. 3:15-cv-00082
EPIC SYSTEMS CORPORATION,
NOTICE OF APPEAL
NOTICE IS HEREBY GIVEN that Defendant Epic Systems Corporation (“Epic”),
pursuant to Section 16 of the Federal Arbitration Act, hereby appeals to the United States Court
of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit the Court’s Order entered in this action on September 11,
2015 [Docket No. 54] denying Epic’s Motion to Dismiss and Compel Individual Arbitration.
See 9 U.S.C. § 16(a) (permitting immediate appeal of order denying motion to compel
arbitration); Janiga v. Questar Capital Corp., 615 F.3d 735, 740 (7th Cir. 2010) (“an
interlocutory appeal may be taken from a district court order ‘refusing a stay of any action . . .
under this title’ or ‘denying a petition . . . to order arbitration to proceed.’”) (citing
9 U.S.C. § 16).
Dated: September 11, 2015
EPIC SYSTEMS CORPORATION
By s/ Andrew Scroggins
One of Its Attorneys
Noah A. Finkel (firstname.lastname@example.org)
Andrew Scroggins (email@example.com)
SEYFARTH SHAW LLP
131 South Dearborn Street, Suite 2400
Chicago, Illinois 60603
CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE
I, Andrew Scroggins, an attorney, hereby certify that on September 11, 2015, a copy of
the foregoing NOTICE OF APPEAL was electronically filed via the Court’s CM/ECF system,
which transmitted service of the same upon the following counsel of record for Applicant:
David C. Zoeller
Caitlin M. Madden
Hawks Quindel, S.C.
222 West Washington Avenue, Suite 450
Madison, Wisconsin 53701-2155
Daniel A. Rottier
Breanne L. Snapp
Habush Habush & Rottier, S.C.
150 East Gilman Street, Ste. 2000
Madison, Wisconsin 53701
s/ Andrew Scroggins
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?