Carroll, Ronald et al v. ABB, Inc. et al
Filing
535
ORDER after July 11, 2017, hearing. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 07/11/2017. (mfh)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
PATRICIA CARROLL, individually and as
personal representative of THE ESTATE OF
RONALD KENNETH CARROLL, deceased,
Plaintiff,
OPINION AND ORDER
v.
15-cv-373-wmc
JOHN CRANE INC.,
Defendant.
This case is set for trial commencing on Monday, July 17, 2017, at 9:00 a.m. The
court held a partial telephonic final pretrial conference on July 11, 2017, at which the
parties appeared by counsel.
The court made several rulings and set deadlines for
additional filings during that hearing, which this order now formalizes.
ORDER
IT IS ORDERED that:
1) Plaintiffs’ sub-motions in limine Nos. 2, 3, 35 and 37 (dkt. #469) are
GRANTED in part and DENIED in part consistent with the court’s rulings on
the record.
2) Plaintiffs advised the court during the telephonic conference that their submotion in limine No. 23 (dkt. #469) is withdrawn.
3) Plaintiffs’ sub-motion in limine No. 21 (dkt. #469) is GRANTED.
4) Plaintiffs’ sub-motion in limine No. 27 (dkt. #469) is RESERVED. On or
before Thursday, July 13, 2017, at 10:00 a.m., defendant may submit a short
brief on legal authority supporting the admission of extrinsic evidence of
criticism of studies relied upon by an expert witness if denied on impeachment.
5) Plaintiffs’ sub-motions in limine Nos. 29 and 32 (dkt. #469) are GRANTED in
part and DENIED in part as set forth on the record.
6) Defendant’s sub-motion in limine No. 5 (dkt. #452) is RESERVED. On or
before Thursday July 13, 2017, at 10:00 a.m., plaintiffs may also submit a
short brief on legal authority supporting the admission of extrinsic evidence of
sources of funding for studies relied upon by an expert witness if denied on
impeachment.
7) Defendant’s sub-motion in limine No. 8 (dkt. #452) is GRANTED in part and
DENIED in part as set forth on the record.
8) Defendant’s motion for protective order (dkt. #440) is GRANTED in part and
DENIED in part as set forth on the record.
9) Consistent with the court’s ruling at the telephonic conference, by the end of
the day on Wednesday, July 12, 2017, the parties are directed to file pareddown exhibit lists containing only exhibits that they realistically expect will be
introduced into evidence at trial. The parties shall file objections to those
revised exhibit lists by the end of the day on Thursday, July 13, 2017. The
court will take up any remaining objections to exhibits during a telephonic
conference on Friday, July 14, 2017, at 12:30 p.m.
10) Although not discussed at today’s telephonic conference, the parties are
further directed as follows:
a) Defendant may file amended objections to the designated deposition
testimony of Dana Hollins on or before Thursday, July 13, 2017, at 10:00
a.m.
b) By the end of the day on Thursday, July 13, 2017, plaintiffs shall file
pared-down deposition designations consistent with the court’s rulings at
today’s telephonic conference, as well as consistent with an effort to
streamline the presentation of evidence and avoid presenting cumulative
testimony. In particular, plaintiffs should avoid designating repeated
testimony in the depositions of George Springs. Additionally, plaintiffs’
pared-down deposition designations should: (i) be separated by whether
they will be offered during the liability phases of trial or the damages phase
of trial; (ii) be presented in the form of a color-coded transcript, with
plaintiffs’ amended, proponent designations clearly marked in one color,
defendant’s counter-designations clearly marked in another color and the
parties’ objections to designated testimony clearly marked with brackets.
c) By Friday, July 14, 2017, at 10:00 a.m., defendant may file any
amended objections to plaintiffs’ pared-down deposition designations and
2
counter-designations, but only if those objections or counter-designations
are different than those listed in the parties’ Joint Deposition Designations
(dkt. #533).
d) Before filing their amended exhibit lists, the parties shall meet and
confer regarding the numbering of trial exhibits so as to number exhibits in
a manner to avoid duplication between plaintiffs’ exhibits and defendant’s
exhibits, as well as to avoid numbering exhibits with decimal places. If
truly necessary, sub-exhibits may be designated by alphabet (e.g., Ex. 1A,
1B, etc.).
e) By Friday, July 14, 2017, at 10:00 a.m., defendant shall provide the
court copies of all contested exhibits, either in electronic or hard-copy form,
that are clearly marked and organized by number.
If submitted
electronically, the file names of the exhibits shall consist only of the exhibit
number.
f) The parties shall ensure that any attorneys who will appear as counsel in
this case have filed a notice of appearance.
11) The court will continue the final conference by telephone at 12:30 p.m. on
Thursday, July 13, 2017, and at 12:30 p.m. on Friday, July 14, 2017, to
address issues remaining before trial. Plaintiff is responsible for setting up
the call to Chambers at 608-264-5087.
Entered this 11th day of July, 2017.
BY THE COURT:
/s/
__________________________________
WILLIAM M. CONLEY
District Judge
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?