Carroll, Ronald et al v. ABB, Inc. et al
Filing
563
ORDER on depositions designations as to Robert Rygh. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 7/18/2017. (jls)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
PATRICIA CARROLL, individually and as
personal representative of THE ESTATE OF
RONALD KENNETH CARROLL, deceased,
Plaintiffs,
ORDER
v.
15-cv-373-wmc
JOHN CRANE INC.,
Defendant.
On the parties’ deposition designations, counter-designations, and objections as to
Robert Rygh, the court rules as follows.
The court reminds the parties that as a general
note applicable to all videotaped deposition excerpts that will be played for the jury, the
party offering the testimony shall include only specifically designated and approved
questions and answers. In particular, that party is responsible for removing all objections
and any other asides or discussions between counsel.
Plaintiffs’
Design’ns
Defendant
Objections
Defendant
Desgin’ns
11:6-13:6
40:4-40:21
41:11-42:18
Plaintiffs’
Objections
12:1-12:8
40:19-40:21
41:1-44:3
43:6-44:19;
44:22; 44:2545:23
46:8-49:19
50:22-51:17;
52:12-55:14
57:14-57:18
57:22-57:25
62:18-63:3
44:17-45:23
46:8-47:25
50:1-55:14
57:14-57:17
57:22-57:25
62:18-63:3
Court Ruling
OVERRULED
OVERRULED
OVERRULED except as to
41:11-41:17
OVERRULED
OVERRULED
OVERRULED except as to
53:7-53:16
OVERRULED
OVERRULED
OVERRULED
Plaintiffs’
Design’ns
Defendant
Objections
Defendant
Desgin’ns
69:4-70:21;
71:12-72:20
76:1-76:22
78:11-81:20
81:24-83:7
83:12-83:15
85:25-86:20
89:1-89:4
115:16-116:16
117:19-119:22
122:3-122:12
125:7-125:12
Plaintiffs’
Objections
69:4-72:20
Court Ruling
76:1-76:22
78:11-81:20
81:24-83:7
83:12-83:15
85:25-86:20
89:1-89:4
115:5-116:6
117:19119:22
122:3122:12
125:7125:12
OVERRULED
OVERRULED
OVERRULED
OVERRULED
OVERRULED
OVERRULED
SUSTAIN
OVERRULED
OVERRULED
OVERRULED
OVERRULED
Entered this 18 day of July, 2017.
BY THE COURT:
/S/
__________________________________
WILLIAM M. CONLEY
District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?