Dunn, Phillip v. Levine, Elliott et al

Filing 21

ORDER denying 19 motion for injunctive relief. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 4/4/2016. (jef),(ps)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PHILLIP S. DUNN, ORDER Plaintiff, 15-cv-430-bbc v. RYAN SECORD, SHAWN KUDRON, DAN ULRICH and NATHAN POKE, Defendants. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Pro se plaintiff Phillip Dunn is proceeding on claims that defendants Dan Ulrich, Nathan Poke, Shawn Kudron and Ryan Secord violated his right to be free from unreasonable searches and seizures on two different occasions in 2014. Now plaintiff has filed a document that he calls an “ex-parte motion for injunctive relief,” in which he seeks relief from an order in a criminal case in state court. Dkt. #19. Because plaintiff is raising issues that are not related to the claims in this case, I am denying his motion. For the same reason, it is not necessary to unseal the motion. City of Greenville, Illinois v. Syngenta Crop Protection, LLC, 764 F.3d 695, 697 (7th Cir. 2014) (“[W]e have limited the presumption of public access to materials that affect judicial decisions.”). 1 ORDER IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff Phillip Dunn’s “ex-parte motion for injunctive relief,” dkt. #19, is DENIED. Entered this 4th day of April, 2016. BY THE COURT: /s/ BARBARA B. CRABB District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?