Dunn, Phillip v. Levine, Elliott et al
Filing
21
ORDER denying 19 motion for injunctive relief. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 4/4/2016. (jef),(ps)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - PHILLIP S. DUNN,
ORDER
Plaintiff,
15-cv-430-bbc
v.
RYAN SECORD, SHAWN KUDRON,
DAN ULRICH and NATHAN POKE,
Defendants.
- - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - Pro se plaintiff Phillip Dunn is proceeding on claims that defendants Dan Ulrich,
Nathan Poke, Shawn Kudron and Ryan Secord violated his right to be free from
unreasonable searches and seizures on two different occasions in 2014. Now plaintiff has
filed a document that he calls an “ex-parte motion for injunctive relief,” in which he seeks
relief from an order in a criminal case in state court. Dkt. #19. Because plaintiff is raising
issues that are not related to the claims in this case, I am denying his motion. For the same
reason, it is not necessary to unseal the motion. City of Greenville, Illinois v. Syngenta Crop
Protection, LLC, 764 F.3d 695, 697 (7th Cir. 2014) (“[W]e have limited the presumption
of public access to materials that affect judicial decisions.”).
1
ORDER
IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff Phillip Dunn’s “ex-parte motion for injunctive relief,”
dkt. #19, is DENIED.
Entered this 4th day of April, 2016.
BY THE COURT:
/s/
BARBARA B. CRABB
District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?