Austin, David v. Smith, Judy et al
Filing
13
ORDER denying plaintiff's 12 motion for an order to pay the remainder of his court filing fee in this case from his release account. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 10/15/2015. (jef),(ps)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
DAVID D. AUSTIN, II,
Plaintiff,
ORDER
v.
Case No. 15-cv-525-jdp
JUDY P. SMITH, ET AL.,
Defendants.
Plaintiff David D. Austin, II, has submitted a motion for an order to pay the remainder of
his court filing fee from his release account. Under the Prison Litigation Reform Act, an inmate
who files a lawsuit in federal court under the in forma pauperis statute must pay the $350 filing
fee, first by making an initial partial payment and then by sending the remainder of the fee to
the court in installments of 20% of the preceding month’s income, in accordance with 28 U.S.C.
§ 1915(b)(2). On September 4, 2015, this court entered an order assessing plaintiff an initial
partial payment of the filing fee for this case, which plaintiff has paid. Plaintiff has been making
monthly installment payments since then.
The language of 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1) requires prison officials to use a prisoner’s release
account to satisfy an initial partial payment if no other funds are available. Carter v. Bennett,
399 F. Supp. 2d 936, 936-37 (W.D. Wis. 2005). However, with the exception of such initial
partial payments, this court does not have the authority to tell state officials whether, and to
what extent, a prisoner should be able to withdraw money from a release account. Because
plaintiff cannot use release account funds to pay the remaining balance of the $350 filing fee, I
will deny this motion.
1
ORDER
IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff David D. Austin, II’s motion for an order to pay the
remainder of his court filing fee in this case from his release account is DENIED.
Entered this 15th day of October, 2015.
BY THE COURT:
/s/
PETER OPPENEER
Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?