Doe No. 55, Jane v. Madison Metropolitan School District

Filing 109

ORDER granting 106 Motion to Exclude Docket Nos. 77, 78 and 79 from the record on appeal. Signed by District Judge Barbara B. Crabb on 4/25/2017. (arw)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - JANE DOE NO. 55, by and through JANE DOE’S MOTHER and JANE DOE’S FATHER, OPINION and ORDER Plaintiff, 15-cv-570-bbc v. MADISON METROPOLITAN SCHOOL DISTRICT, Defendant. - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - - In an order dated November 16, 2016, I granted defendant Madison Metropolitan School District’s motion for summary judgment on plaintiff Jane Doe No. 55's claim that the district acted negligently and violated Title IX of the Education Amendments of 1972 by failing to prevent a district employee from sexually abusing plaintiff. Dkt. #92. After I denied her motion for reconsideration, dkt. #101, plaintiff filed a notice of appeal, dkt. #102. Now the district has filed a motion under Fed. R. App. P. 10 to exclude three documents from the appellate record. Dkt. #77 (2016 Investigative Report), dkt. #78 (Ptak Personnel File) and dkt. #79 (Ptak Health File). Because the parties did not rely on those documents in their summary judgment submissions, I did not rely on the documents in the summary judgment opinion and plaintiff does not oppose the district’s motion, I will grant the motion. ORDER IT IS ORDERED that defendant Madison Metropolitan School District’s motion to exclude docket nos. 77, 78 and 79 from the appellate record, dkt. #106, is GRANTED. Entered this 25th day of April, 2017. BY THE COURT: /s/ __________________________________ BARBARA B. CRABB District Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?