Boyd, Demetrius v. Boughton, Gary

Filing 2

ORDER on ifp request: Petitioner to submit $5 fee or motion for ifp. Fee or Motion due 12/2/2015. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 11/12/2015. (jef),(ps)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN DEMETRIUS BOYD , Petitioner, ORDER v. Case No. 15-CV-718-WMC GARY BOUGHTON, Respondent. Petitioner Demetrius Boyd seeks a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has neither paid the $5 filing fee nor requested leave to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. For this case to move forward, petitioner must pay the $5 filing fee or submit a properly supported motion for leave to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee no later than December 2, 2015. Federal law does not permit a court to waive a prisoner’s entire obligation to pay filing fees, but it does allow a qualifying individual to proceed without prepaying some or all of the filing fee. To determine whether petitioner qualifies as indigent, any motion for leave to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee must include a certified copy of an inmate trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the six-month period beginning approximately May 5, 2015 through the date of the petition, November 5, 2015. ORDER IT IS ORDERED that: 1. Petitioner Demetrius Boyd may have until December 2, 2015, to pay the $5 filing fee or submit a properly supported motion for leave to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. 2. If petitioner does not submit either the $5 payment or a motion for leave to proceed without prepayment before December 2, 2015, I will assume that petitioner wishes to withdraw this action voluntarily and will dismiss the petition without further notice. Entered this 12th day of November, 2015. BY THE COURT: /s/ PETER OPPENEER Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?