Estate of Ashley DiPiazza v. City of Madison et al

Filing 236

ORDER on Deposition Designations, Counter-Designations, and Objections as to Damages. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 7/12/2017. (kwf)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN THE ESTATE OF ASHLEY DIPIAZZA, Plaintiff, ORDER v. 16-cv-60-wmc JUSTIN BAILEY, GARY PIHLAJA, and CARY LEEREK, Defendants. On the parties’ deposition designations, counter-designations, and objections as to damages (dkts. ## 198, 213, and 228), the court rules as follows. The court reserves as to portions of the objections pending stipulation of the parties (and/or argument while the jury is deliberating as to liability) on the scope of plaintiff’s damages claims. Plaintiff’s Design’ns 82:14-86:8 87:8-93:21 Defendants’ CounterDesign’ns 15:18-27:19 47:2-19 59:3-64:19 65:3-76:8; 76:9-77:24 77:25-79:21 80:19-24 Defendants’ Design’ns Plaintiff’s Objections 15:18-27:19 167:17168:8; 184:2-24 46:3-4 47:2-19 59:3-64:19 65:3-81:22 Defendants’ Objections 15:18-27:19 167:17168:8; 184:2-24 Plaintiff’s CounterDesign’ns Court Ruling SUSTAIN SUSTAIN EXCLUDE SUSTAIN SUSTAIN SUSTAIN objections 82:14-84:10; 84:15-22 [no objection: 79:22-80:18; 80:25-81:22] SUSTAIN objection 88:4-90:9; 91:20-93:21 [no objection: 84:11-14; 84:23-86:8] SUSTAIN objections [no objection: 94:8-14 121:16125:12 157:2-10 161:5167:16 87:8-88:3; 90:10-91:19] EXCLUDE 15:18-27:19 121:16125:12 157:2-10 161:5-162:17; 190:7-13 162:18163:20; 166:3-18; 167:3-16 RESERVE SUSTAIN SUSTAIN objection and EXCLUDE counterdesignation [no objection: 163:21-166:2; 166:19-167:2] SUSTAIN objection and EXCLUDE counterdesignation 172:8174:23 172:8-174:23 190:7-13 175:5176:5 175:5-176:5 190:7-13 178:19180:4 189:11190:6 203:3205:10 178:19-180:4 RESERVE 189:11-190:6 SUSTAIN 203:3-205:10 SUSTAIN SUSTAIN objection and EXCLUDE counterdesignation Entered this 12th day of July, 2017. BY THE COURT: /s/ WILLIAM M. CONLEY District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?