Dilley, Judy v. Holiday Acres Stables et al
Filing
148
ORDER denying plaintiff Judy Dilley's 141 motion to stay the enforcement of bill of costs. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 10/24/2017. (jef),(ps)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
JUDY DILLEY,
Plaintiff,
v.
OPINION & ORDER
HOLIDAY ACRES PROPERTIES, INC. and
STEVE KRIER,
16-cv-91-jdp
Defendants.
Plaintiff Judy Dilley was injured when she fell from a horse provided by defendant Steve
Krier’s business, Holiday Stables, which is located on land owned by defendant Holiday Acres
Properties, Inc. Dilley asserted claims against Holiday Acres and Krier, alleging that they failed
to ensure her safety. The court granted summary judgment in favor of defendants under
Wisconsin’s equine immunity statute, Wis. Stat. § 895.481, and Dilley appealed. Dkt. 103;
Dkt. 122; Dkt. 142.
Dilley now asks the court to stay enforcement of the bill of costs pending appeal. Dkt.
141. Holiday Acres opposes. Dkt. 147. “[A] district court may award costs even while the
substantive appeal is pending.” Lorenz v. Valley Forge Ins. Co., 23 F.3d 1259, 1260 (7th Cir.
1994). Dilley’s motion is denied.
Dilley does not claim that she cannot pay the costs; she simply says she has a nonfrivolous appeal and the court has the discretion to allow a losing party to delay payment
without posting a bond. But Holiday Acres raises a reasonable concern about whether it will
be able to collect. So Dilley has two options: she can either pay the amount owed to defendants,
or she can pay the amount owed to the court. If she pays the court, whoever prevails on appeal
will get the costs and whatever interest accrues.
ORDER
IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff Judy Dilley’s motion to stay the enforcement of bill of
costs, Dkt. 141, is DENIED.
Entered October 24, 2017.
BY THE COURT:
/s/
________________________________________
JAMES D. PETERSON
District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?