ROSS, ROMELLE v. USA

Filing 11

Transmission of Notice of Appeal, Docketing Statement, Judgment and Docket Sheet to Seventh Circuit Court of Appeals re: 7 Notice of Appeal, (Attachments: # 1 Docketing Statement, # 2 Judgment, # 3 Docket Sheet) (lak)

Download PDF
UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN ROMELLE ROSS, Petitioner-Appellant, v. Case No. 16-cv-113 UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Respondent-Appellee. NOTICE OF APPEAL Romelle Ross, by counsel, hereby gives notice pursuant to Fed. R. App. P. 3(c) & 4(a)(1)(B) that he appeals the order denying his petition under 28 U.S.C. § 2255, which was imposed on May 6, 2016, in the United States District Court for the Western District of Wisconsin, the Honorable Barbara B. Crabb presiding. Mr. Ross takes this appeal to the United States Court of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit. The district court issued a certificate of appealability pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2253 & Fed. R. App. P. 22(b), authorizing this appeal, in the same order denying the § 2255 petition. With this notice of appeal, Mr. Ross also files the docketing statement required by Circ. Rule 3 (7th Cir.), combined with a Cir. Rule 26.1 disclosure statement. Mr. Ross also files a motion to proceed in forma pauperis on appeal. FEDERAL DEFENDER SERVICES OF WISCONSIN, INC. Dated at Madison, Wisconsin, June 27, 2016. Respectfully submitted, Romelle Ross, Appellant /s/ Shelley M. Fite Shelley M. Fite FEDERAL DEFENDER SERVICES OF WISCONSIN, INC. 22 East Mifflin Street, Suite 1000 Madison, Wisconsin 53703 Tel: 608-260-9900 Fax: 608-260-9901 Shelley_fite@fd.org CERTIFICATE OF SERVICE I hereby certify that I caused a true and correct copy of the foregoing to be served by the Court’s CM/ECF System to Assistant United States Attorney Alice H. Green, this 27th day of June, 2016. /s/ Shelley M. Fite Shelley M. Fite FEDERAL DEFENDER SERVICES OF WISCONSIN, INC. 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?