McMahon, Jerry v. State of Wisconsin

Filing 4

ORDER on ifp request: Fee or Trust Fund Account Statement due 6/7/2016. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 5/20/2016. (jef),(ps)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN JERRY ALLEN MCMAHON, Petitioner, ORDER v. Case No. 16-cv-327-wmc STATE OF WISCONSIN, Respondent. Petitioner Jerry Allen McMahon seeks a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C. § 2254. Petitioner has submitted a motion for leave to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee, dkt. #2, and submitted an uncertified monthly inmate trust account statement covering the period from April 22, 2016 to May 6, 2016, to support this request. However, I cannot consider petitioner’s motion, because the trust fund account statement petitioner submitted is insufficient to determine whether plaintiff qualifies for indigent status. For this case to move forward, petitioner must either pay the $5 filing fee or submit a certified inmate trust fund account statement (or institutional equivalent) for the six-month period immediately preceding the filing of this habeas corpus petition. If petitioner does not submit either the $5 filing fee or a trust fund account statement before June 7, 2016, I will assume that petitioner wishes to withdraw this action voluntarily and will dismiss the petition without prejudice under Fed. R. Civ. P. 41(a). ORDER IT IS ORDERED that Petitioner Jerry Allen McMahon may have until June 7, 2016, to pay the $5 filing fee or submit a certified trust fund account statement for the period beginning approximately November 11, 2015 through the date of the petition, May 11, 2016. If by June 7, 2016, petitioner fails to respond to this order, I will assume that petitioner wishes to withdraw this action voluntarily and will dismiss the action without prejudice. Entered this 20th day of May, 2016. BY THE COURT: /s/ PETER OPPENEER Magistrate Judge

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?