Knope, Kevin v. State of Wisconsin et al
Filing
35
ORDER that the clerk of court shall issue a subpoena and arrange service on Mr. Knope's behalf upon Journey Mental Health Center, Inc. by the U.S. Marshal Service. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 10/26/2017. (jef),(ps)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
KEVIN MICHAEL KNOPE,
Plaintiff,
ORDER
v.
16-cv-381-wmc
POLICE OFFICER JOHN DOE,
and JANE DOE,
Defendants.
The U.S. Marshal has returned an unexecuted process receipt for Jenna Celeski,
a/k/a defendant “Jane Doe.” The Marshal’s receipt further states that Journey Mental
Health front desk staff reported having no record of Jenna Celeski being employed there.
Now plaintiff has submitted notes from a phone call he made on September 19,
2017, to the Journey Mental Health Center crisis line, in which the person answering the
phone stated that Jenna Celeski was someone who no longer worked there. (See dkt. 31.)
Plaintiff also submitted a request for discovery from Journey, which the court construes to
be a request for subpoena. As it appears that a Jenna Celeski may have been formerly
employed by Journey Mental Health Center, this court will issue a subpoena to Journey
Mental Health Center, Inc. to produce to the court, under seal, records disclosing the
identity and whereabouts of the individual who signed the initial detention form, believed
to be “Jenna Celeski” or some similar name. Once Journey responds, the court will direct
the U.S. Marshal Service to serve Celeski with a summons and the amended complaint.
ORDER
IT IS ORDERED that the clerk of court shall issue a subpoena consistent with the
above and arrange service on Mr. Knope’s behalf upon Journey Mental Health Center, Inc.
by the U.S. Marshal Service.
Entered this 26th day of October, 2017.
BY THE COURT:
/s/
WILLIAM M. CONLEY
District Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?