Stapleton, Norman v. Hepp, Randall et al

Filing 29

HIPAA Qualified Protective Order. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 1/10/2017. (jef),(ps)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN

NORMAN STAPLETON,
Plaintiff,

v.

Case No. 16-CV-406

RANDALL HEPP, ET AL.,
Defendants.
IDP AA QUALIFIED PROTECTIVE ORDER
Pursuant to Rule 26(c) of the Federal Rules of Civil Procedure and 45 C.F.R. §
164.512(e)(l), the Court finds good cause for the issuance of a qualified protective order and
ORDERS as follows:
1.

The parties and their attorneys are hereby authorized to receive and transmit

"protected health information" pertaining to Fox Lake Correctional Institution's current and
former inmates subjected to Fox Lake Correctional Institution's water supply between January 1,
2009 to the present.
2.

For the purposes of this qualified protective order, "protected health information"

shall have the same scope and definition as set forth in 45 C.F.R. § 160.103 and 164.501.
Protected health information includes, without limitation, health or demographic information
relating to: (i) any inmate health complaints related to Fox Lake Correctional Institution's water
supply between January 1, 2009 to the present; (ii) any inmate health requests for
accommodation or treatment related to Fox Lake Correctional Institution's water supply; and (iii)

health information received from counsel pursuant to paragraph four of this Order, shall return
the protected health information to the covered entity or destroy any and all copies of protected
health information pertaining to the current and former inmates at Fox Lake Correctional
Institution, except that counsel is not required to secure the return or destruction of protected
health information submitted to the court.
7.

This Order does not control or limit the use of protected health information

pertaining to the current and former inmates at Fox Lake Correctional Institution that come into
the possession of the parties, or their attorneys, from a source other than a "covered entity," as
that term is defined in 45 C.F.R. § 160.103.
8.

Nothing in this Order authorizes counsel for Plaintiff or Defendants to obtain

medical records or protected health information through means other than formal discovery
requests, subpoenas, depositions, pursuant to a patient authorization, or other lawful process.
9.

This Order does not authorize any party to seal court filings or court proceedings.

The Court will make a good cause determination for filing under seal if and when the parties
seek to file protected health information under seal.

__
Dated: _c)*1J_V_lt'_~_J_t;,_i.o_t7

ENTERED

?!t:~:::~
District Court Judge

3