Kilty, Pamela et al v. Weyerhaeuser Company et al
Filing
249
ORDER: All plaintiffs in the Kilty lawsuit and their attorneys are jointly and severally responsible to pay $1392 in expenses to counsel for defendant Weyerhaeuser and $1037.50 to counsel for defendant 3M not later than 14 days after the court rules on plaintiffs' Rule 72 appeal. Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 3/22/18. (jat)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
PAM KILTY, Individually and
as Special Administrator, et al.,
Plaintiffs
ORDER
16-cv-515-wmc
v.
WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY and
3M COMPANY,
Defendants.
SCOTT SPATZ, as Special Administrator,
Plaintiff
ORDER
v.
16-cv-726-wmc
WEYERHAEUSER COMPANY and
3M COMPANY,
Defendants.
On March 7, 2018, this court denied plaintiffs’ twin motions to allow specified depositions
after the close of discovery and ordered cost-shifting in favor of the defendants in both cases
pursuant to F.R. Civ. Pro. 37(a)(5)(B).
See dkt. 199 in Kilty, dkt.151 in Spatz.
Defendant
Weyerhaeuser submitted an itemized request for $2,784 in costs to cover both motions in both cases.
See dkt. 224 (Kilty) and dkt. 178 (Spatz). Defendant 3M split its costs in half and asked for
$1,037.50 in each case (dkt. 225 in Kilty, dkt. 177 in Spatz), for a total of $2,075.
Plaintiffs have filed Rule 72 appeals objecting to the court’s substantive ruling, dkt. 242
(Kilty) and dkt. 200 (Spatz); these appeals are being briefed and which will be decided by Judge
Conley. Plaintiffs also filed separate objections to the cost-shifting aspect of the March 7 orders (dkt.
243 in Kilty, dkt. 201 in Spatz), but they simply incorporate their arguments from their appeals.
I already have found that cost-shifting is appropriate and I am not persuaded that plaintiffs’
motions were substantially justified or that there are other circumstances that would make an award
of expenses unjust. I also find that the amounts claimed are reasonable. Accordingly, I am ordering
plaintiffs and their attorneys to pay the amounts requested, but their deadline to pay will be 14 days
after Judge Conley rules on their appeals.
ORDER
IT IS ORDERED that:
(1) All plaintiffs in the Kilty lawsuit and their attorneys are jointly and severally responsible
to pay $1392 in expenses to counsel for defendant Weyerhaeuser and $1037.50 to counsel for
defendant 3M not later than 14 days after the court rules on plaintiffs’ Rule 72 appeal.
(1) The plaintiff in the Spatz lawsuit and their attorneys are jointly and severally responsible
to pay $1392 in expenses to counsel for defendant Weyerhaeuser and $1037.50 to counsel for
defendant 3M not later than 14 days after the court rules on plaintiffs’ Rule 72 appeal.
Entered this 22nd day of March, 2018.
BY THE COURT:
/s/
STEPHEN L. CROCKER
Magistrate Judge
2
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?