Bank of America, N.A. v. Ethun, Chad et al

Filing 14

ORDER that this case is REMANDED to the Circuit Court for Dane County, Wisconsin. The clerk of court is directed to close this court's file and return the record to the state court. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 4/20/2018. (jef),(ps)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN BANK OF AMERICA, N.A., Plaintiff, v. CHAD S. ETHUN, MARK ETHUN, PAUL H. ETHUN, TARA ETHUN, UNKNOWN SPOUSE OF CHAD S. ETHUN, UNKNOWN SPOUSE OF MARK ETHUN, UNKNOWN SPOUSE OF PAUL H. ETHUN, SECRETARY OF HOUSING AND URBAN DEVELOPMENT, and UNKNOWN SPOUSE OF TARA ETHUN, ORDER 16-cv-624-jdp Defendants. Plaintiff Bank of America filed a foreclosure action for property in DeForest, Wisconsin, against members of the Ethun family in Dane County Circuit Court. Chad, Mark, Paul, and Tara Ethun filed a notice of removal and a motion for leave to proceed in forma pauperis. After Mark Ethun followed up with a motion to withdraw the removal, Bank of America requested that the case be remanded. I issued an order stating that I could not remand the case solely on Mark’s request, because he cannot represent his co-plaintiffs in the case. See Dkt. 10. I gave the Ethuns a deadline to respond to that order, but they did not. Bank of America filed two motions to remand the case, to which the Ethuns have not responded either. Because the Ethuns have not prosecuted the removal and it appears that the parties agree that the case should be litigated in state court, I will remand the case. ORDER IT IS ORDERED that this case is REMANDED to the Circuit Court for Dane County, Wisconsin. The clerk of court is directed to close this court’s file and return the record to the state court. Entered April 20, 2018. BY THE COURT: /s/ ________________________________________ JAMES D. PETERSON District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?