Davis, Dennis v. Colvin, Carolyn

Filing 16

ORDER granting 15 Motion to Remand for Further Proceedings Pursuant to Sentence Four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g). Signed by Magistrate Judge Stephen L. Crocker on 4/17/2017. (kwf)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN DENNIS J. DAVIS, Plaintiff, Case No. 16-cv-678-slc V. NANCY A. BERRYHILL, ACTING COMMISSIONER OF SOCIAL SECURITY, Defendant. ORDER ON THE PARTIES' JOINT MOTION FOR REMAND FOR FURTHER PROCEEDINGS PURSUANT TO SENTENCE FOUR OF 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) Pursuant to the power of this Court to enter a judgment affirming, modifying or reversing the Commissioner's decision with remand in Social Security actions under sentence four of section 205(g) of the Social Security Act, 42 U.S.C. § 405(g), and in light of the parties' joint motion to remand this action, this Court now, upon substantive review, hereby enters a judgment under sentence four of 42 U.S.C. § 405(g) reversing the Commissioner's decision with a remand of the cause to the Commissioner according to the following terms. See Sh.alala v. Schaefer, 509 U.S. 292, 296 (1993); Melkonyan v. Sullivan, 501 U.S. 89, 97-98 (1991). On remand, an administrative law judge (ALJ) will consider the medical statements located at exhibits 9F and lOF of the administrative record. The ALJ will consider any arguments or evidence raised by Plaintiff as to the identity of the author of those exhibits. The ALJ will reconsider Plaintiff's allegations, consistent with applicable regulations rules and regulations, in light of the evidence, and reevaluate Plaintiff's residual functional capacity. If necessary, the ALJ will obtain supplemental vocational expert testimony to assist in reaching findings at steps four and/ or five. The ALJ shall issue a de novo decision consistent with all applicable rules and regulations. SO ORDERED this f)-1 J l day of ftfR.J L HON. STEPHEN L. CROCKER United States Magistrate Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?