Smith, Tyrone, et al v. State of Wisconsin Court of Appeals, District One
Filing
5
ORDER that Petitioner Tyrone Davis Smith's 3 motion for leave to proceed withoutprepayment of the filing fee is DENIED. Full $5 filing fee due 2/15/17. Signed by Magistrate Judge Peter A. Oppeneer on 1/24/2017. (nln),(ps)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
STATE OF WISCONSIN, ex rel.
and TYRONE DAVIS SMITH,
ORDER
Petitioners,
v.
Case No. 17-cv-49-bbc
STATE OF WISCONSIN COURT OF
APPEALS, DITRICT ONE,
Respondents.
Petitioner Tyrone Davis Smith seeks a writ of habeas corpus pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 2241. Petitioner requests leave to proceed without prepayment of the filing fee. Petitioner
has supported this request with an affidavit of indigency and a six-month trust account
statement from the institution.
In determining whether to allow a prisoner to proceed without prepayment, this court
uses the formula set forth in 28 U.S.C. § 1915(b)(1). Using information for the relevant
time period from petitioner’s trust fund account statement, I find that petitioner is able to
pay the filing fee.
Accordingly, I will deny petitioner’s application for leave to proceed
without prepayment of the filing fee. To proceed further on this habeas petition, petitioner
must pay the $5 filing fee.
If petitioner fails to pay the fee by February 15, 2017, the
petition, I will assume that petition wishes to withdraw this petition.
ORDER
IT IS ORDERED that:
1.
Petitioner Tyrone Davis Smith’s motion for leave to proceed without
prepayment of the filing fee is DENIED. Petitioner has until February 15, 2017 in which to
pay the $5 filing fee.
2.
If by February 15, 2017 petitioner fails to submit the $5 filing fee, I will
assume that petitioner wishes to withdraw this petition.
Entered this 24th day of January, 2017.
BY THE COURT:
/s/
PETER OPPENEER
Magistrate Judge
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?