Proue, Ardis et al v. Howmedica Osteonics et al
Filing
12
Conditional Transfer Order (Copy). Signed by Jeffery N. Luthi, Clerk of the Panel on 4/17/2017. (kwf)
UNITED STATES J UDICIAL PANEL
on
MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION
IN RE: STRYKER LFIT V40 FEMORAL HEAD
PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
MDL No. 2768
(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)
CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO −1)
On April 5, 2017, the Panel transferred 3 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the
District of Massachusetts for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1407. See _F.Supp.3d_ (J.P.M.L. 2017). Since that time, no additional action(s) have been
transferred to the District of Massachusetts. With the consent of that court, all such actions have
been assigned to the Honorable Indira Talwani.
It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are
common to the actions previously transferred to the District of Massachusetts and assigned to Judge
Talwani.
Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict
Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the
District of Massachusetts for the reasons stated in the order of April 5, 2017, and, with the consent
of that court, assigned to the Honorable Indira Talwani.
This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States
District Court for the District of Massachusetts. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be
stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the
Panel within this 7−day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.
FOR THE PANEL:
Apr 17, 2017
Jeffery N. Lüthi
Clerk of the Panel
IN RE: STRYKER LFIT V40 FEMORAL HEAD
PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION
MDL No. 2768
SCHEDULE CTO−1 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS
DIST
DIV.
C.A.NO.
CASE CAPTION
3
4
17−00050
17−00001
Schulz v. Howmedica Osteonics et al
Witt et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
17−00123
Gmuer v. Howmedica Osteonics et al
17−00081
DALE, et al v. HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP
1
17−00587
Halfman v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation
0
0
0
16−02073
17−00742
17−00771
Denne et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation et al
Smeins v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Pitts v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
3
3
3
3
3
3
17−00416
17−00417
17−00465
17−00751
17−02010
17−02034
KUEHL v. HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS et al
SHERMAN v. HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS et al
PEREZ v. HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS et al
MCGUIRE v. HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS et al
FROST et al v. HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS et al
TRENT v. HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS et al
ALASKA
AK
AK
FLORIDA MIDDLE
FLM
5
GEORGIA MIDDLE
GAM
5
ILLINOIS NORTHERN
ILN
MINNESOTA
MN
MN
MN
NEW JERSEY
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NEW YORK SOUTHERN
NYS
7
16−05774
PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN
Gidora v. Stryker Corp. et al
Opposed 4/14/17
PAE
5
17−01056
ANDRUKAITIS et al v. HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS
et al
PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN
PAW
2
16−00734
KELLER et al v. HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS
CORPORATION
17−00190
17−00724
Brown et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation et al
Sadler v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
TEXAS SOUTHERN
TXS
TXS
4
4
WASHINGTON WESTERN
WAW
3
17−05219
Bridges v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation et al
17−00079
17−00080
Proue, Ardis et al v. Howmedica Osteonics
Segerstrom, Steven et al v. Howmedica Osteonics
WISCONSIN WESTERN
WIW
WIW
3
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?