Segerstrom, Steven et al v. Howmedica Osteonics et al

Filing 10

Conditional Transfer Order (Copy). Signed by Jeffery N. Luthi, Clerk of the Panel on 4/17/2017. (kwf)

UNITED STATES J UDICIAL PANEL
on
MULTIDISTRICT LITIGATION

IN RE: STRYKER LFIT V40 FEMORAL HEAD
PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

MDL No. 2768

(SEE ATTACHED SCHEDULE)

CONDITIONAL TRANSFER ORDER (CTO −1)

On April 5, 2017, the Panel transferred 3 civil action(s) to the United States District Court for the
District of Massachusetts for coordinated or consolidated pretrial proceedings pursuant to 28 U.S.C.
§ 1407. See _F.Supp.3d_ (J.P.M.L. 2017). Since that time, no additional action(s) have been
transferred to the District of Massachusetts. With the consent of that court, all such actions have
been assigned to the Honorable Indira Talwani.
It appears that the action(s) on this conditional transfer order involve questions of fact that are
common to the actions previously transferred to the District of Massachusetts and assigned to Judge
Talwani.
Pursuant to Rule 7.1 of the Rules of Procedure of the United States Judicial Panel on Multidistrict
Litigation, the action(s) on the attached schedule are transferred under 28 U.S.C. § 1407 to the
District of Massachusetts for the reasons stated in the order of April 5, 2017, and, with the consent
of that court, assigned to the Honorable Indira Talwani.
This order does not become effective until it is filed in the Office of the Clerk of the United States
District Court for the District of Massachusetts. The transmittal of this order to said Clerk shall be
stayed 7 days from the entry thereof. If any party files a notice of opposition with the Clerk of the
Panel within this 7−day period, the stay will be continued until further order of the Panel.

FOR THE PANEL:
Apr 17, 2017

Jeffery N. Lüthi
Clerk of the Panel

IN RE: STRYKER LFIT V40 FEMORAL HEAD
PRODUCTS LIABILITY LITIGATION

MDL No. 2768

SCHEDULE CTO−1 − TAG−ALONG ACTIONS

DIST

DIV.

C.A.NO.

CASE CAPTION

3
4

17−00050
17−00001

Schulz v. Howmedica Osteonics et al
Witt et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.

17−00123

Gmuer v. Howmedica Osteonics et al

17−00081

DALE, et al v. HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS CORP

1

17−00587

Halfman v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation

0
0
0

16−02073
17−00742
17−00771

Denne et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation et al
Smeins v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.
Pitts v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.

3
3
3
3
3
3

17−00416
17−00417
17−00465
17−00751
17−02010
17−02034

KUEHL v. HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS et al
SHERMAN v. HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS et al
PEREZ v. HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS et al
MCGUIRE v. HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS et al
FROST et al v. HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS et al
TRENT v. HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS et al

ALASKA
AK
AK

FLORIDA MIDDLE
FLM

5

GEORGIA MIDDLE
GAM

5

ILLINOIS NORTHERN
ILN
MINNESOTA
MN
MN
MN
NEW JERSEY
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ
NJ

NEW YORK SOUTHERN
NYS

7

16−05774

PENNSYLVANIA EASTERN

Gidora v. Stryker Corp. et al

Opposed 4/14/17

PAE

5

17−01056

ANDRUKAITIS et al v. HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS
et al

PENNSYLVANIA WESTERN
PAW

2

16−00734

KELLER et al v. HOWMEDICA OSTEONICS
CORPORATION

17−00190
17−00724

Brown et al v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation et al
Sadler v. Howmedica Osteonics Corp.

TEXAS SOUTHERN
TXS
TXS

4
4

WASHINGTON WESTERN
WAW

3

17−05219

Bridges v. Howmedica Osteonics Corporation et al

17−00079
17−00080

Proue, Ardis et al v. Howmedica Osteonics
Segerstrom, Steven et al v. Howmedica Osteonics

WISCONSIN WESTERN
WIW
WIW

3
3