Boyd, Vincent v. Heil, Chris et al

Filing 25

ORDER denying in part and reserving in part plaintiff's 24 Motion for Leave to Contact Mother as a Witness. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 7/17/2019. (nln),(ps)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN VINCENT E. BOYD, Plaintiff, v. ORDER 17-cv-209-wmc CHRIS HEIL, TANIA REINDL, BRIAN FOSTER, MICHAEL BAENEN, LT. SWIEKATOWSKI, LT. VANLANEN, LT. VANDEWALLE, and WARDEN ECKSTEIN, Defendants. The court is in receipt of plaintiff Vincent E. Boyd’s “motion for leave to contact mother as a witness.” (Dkt. #24.) By its caption, the motion appears intended to allow plaintiff to contact his motion for discovery purposes. If that is all that is intended, the motion is DENIED in part and RESERVED in part as follows. Plaintiff’s request to contact his mother directly in violation of any existing order by DOC or other court is denied pending his providing a copy of all such existing orders. Plaintiff should also file with the court the specific, written discovery requests he has in the form of interrogatories and document requests, along with any contact information for his mother. To the extent that plaintiff requests a preliminary injunction, removing the prison’s “no contact” order for other purposes, he will need to bring a separate, formal motion to that effect, following the court’s procedures to be filed on motions for injunctive relief, which specifically requires filing of proposed findings of facts, as set forth in the attached materials. Entered this 17th day of July, 2019. BY THE COURT: /s/ __________________________________ WILLIAM M. CONLEY District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?