Clark, Jeremy et al v. Foster, Brian et al

Filing 45

ORDER granting plaintiff Jeremy N. Clark's 44 motion for assistance in recruiting counsel. All remaining deadlines are STRUCK and the case is STAYED pending recruitment of counsel for Clark. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 11/9/2018. (jef),(ps)

Download PDF
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN JEREMY N. CLARK, Plaintiff, v. ORDER 17-cv-393-jdp HEATHER HEINEN, Defendant. Plaintiff Jeremy N. Clark, appearing pro se, is a prisoner at Waupun Correctional Institution. He alleges that defendant Heather Heinen failed to respond appropriately to his psychotic episode, which resulted in his attempted suicide. The case is set for trial in March 2019. Clark renews his motion for the court’s assistance in recruiting him counsel. Dkt. 44. I held a telephonic conference on November 9, 2018, to provide an overview of pretrial and trial procedures, and to ask Clark to further explain his reasons for seeking recruitment of counsel. After the hearing, I am persuaded that the trial in this case will likely be too complex for Clark to handle on his own, so I will grant his motion and strike the current schedule. If I find counsel willing to represent Clark, I will advise the parties of that fact. Soon thereafter, a status conference will be held to set a new schedule. Clark should know that because of the large number of requests for counsel that the court receives, the search for counsel may take several weeks or even months and there is no guarantee that the court will find counsel willing to represent him. ORDER IT IS ORDERED that plaintiff Jeremy N. Clark’s motion for assistance in recruiting counsel, Dkt. 44, is GRANTED. All remaining deadlines are STRUCK and the case is STAYED pending recruitment of counsel for Clark. Entered November 9, 2018. BY THE COURT: /s/ ________________________________________ JAMES D. PETERSON District Judge 2

Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.


Why Is My Information Online?