Robinson, Aldric v. Foster, Brian et al
Filing
51
ORDER granting in part and denying in part 40 Motion in Limine; granting 47 Motion for Writ of Habeas Corpus ad testificandum. The clerk of court is directed to issue writs for Joshua Shadduck at Fox Lake Correctional Institution and Jarvis Duke at Waupun Correctional Institution. Signed by District Judge James D. Peterson on 5/9/2019. (jef),(ps)
IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
ALDRIC ROBINSON,
Plaintiff,
v.
ORDER
JACOB GRIPENTROG and
BRANDON MUELLER,
17-cv-586-jdp
Defendants.
Pro se plaintiff and prisoner Aldric Robinson is proceeding on a claim that defendants
Jacob Gripentrog and Brandon Mueller failed to prevent Robinson from harming himself by
swallowing pills, in violation of the Eighth Amendment. Trial is scheduled for June 13, 2019.
Two matters are before the court: (1) Robinson’s petition for two writs of habeas corpus ad
testificandum, Dkt. 47; and (2) defendants’ motions in limine, Dkt. 40.
I will grant Robinson’s petition to issue writs for prisoners Joshua Shadduck and Jarvis
Duke. Robinson has submitted declarations from both prisoners, who both aver that they
witnessed the events the gave rise to the lawsuit, see Dkt. 48 and Dkt. 49, so Robinson has
shown that Shadduck and Duke may have relevant testimony. I note that both prisoners aver
that they are housed at Waupun Correctional Institution, but the Wisconsin Department of
Corrections inmate locator website shows that Shadduck is now housed at Fox Lake
Correctional Institution, so I will direct the clerk of court to issues writs to the wardens of both
prisons.
Defendants have filed two motions in limine. The first is to “exclude[e] any argument,
testimony, or evidence regarding causation of physical injury, permanence, future care and
treatment, or future pain and suffering.” Dkt. 40, at 1. I agree with defendants that Robinson
isn’t qualified to give an opinion about future treatment he may need or future pain and
suffering he may experience. But I will allow him to describe the symptoms he experienced
after swallowing the pills. At this point, I am not persuaded that an expert is need to infer
causation. Cyrus v. Town of Mukwonago, 624 F.3d 856, 865 (7th Cir. 2010) (“[T]he general rule
is that expert testimony is not necessary to prove causation if all the primary facts can be
accurately and intelligibly described to the jury, and if they, as men of common understanding,
are as capable of comprehending the primary facts and of drawing correct conclusions from
them as are witnesses possessed of special or peculiar training, experience or observation.”)
(internal quotations omitted).
Defendants’ second motion is to “exclude any argument, questions, testimony, or
evidence with regard to lawsuits, complaints, or newspaper articles relating or referring to the
Wisconsin Department of Corrections.” Dkt. 40, at 2. Robinson hasn’t identified any lawsuits,
complaints, or newspaper articles that he plans to offer, so I will grant this motion.
ORDER
IT IS ORDERED that:
1. Plaintiff Aldric Robinson’s petition for writs of habeas corpus ad testificandum,
Dkt. 47, is GRANTED for the June 13, 2019 trial. The clerk of court is directed to
2
issue writs for Joshua Shadduck at Fox Lake Correctional Institution and Jarvis
Duke at Waupun Correctional Institution.
2. The motions in limine filed by defendants Jacob Gripentrog and Brandon Mueller,
Dkt. 40, are GRANTED in part and DENIED in part as described in this order.
Entered May 9, 2019.
BY THE COURT:
/s/
________________________________________
JAMES D. PETERSON
District Judge
3
Disclaimer: Justia Dockets & Filings provides public litigation records from the federal appellate and district courts. These filings and docket sheets should not be considered findings of fact or liability, nor do they necessarily reflect the view of Justia.
Why Is My Information Online?