Myrick, Levi et al v. H.S.U. - Columbia Corr. Institution Health Service Dept. et al

Filing 22

ORDER denying 9 Motion for a preliminary injunction. Signed by District Judge William M. Conley on 9/18/2018. (jef),(ps)

IN THE UNITED STATES DISTRICT COURT
FOR THE WESTERN DISTRICT OF WISCONSIN
LEVI SETH MYRICK,
Plaintiff,

ORDER

v.
Case No. 17-cv-603-wmc
H.S.U. – COLUMBIA CORR.
INSTITUTION HEALTH SERVICES
DEPT. and HEALTH SERVICES
MANAGER J. GOHDE,
Defendants.

Plaintiff Levi Myrick has filed a motion for a preliminary injunction, seeking an
injunction for “proper medical care.” (Dkt. #9.) However, the motion is deficient because
Myrick has not complied with this court’s procedure for obtaining preliminary injunctive relief,
a copy of which will be provided to plaintiff with this order. Under these procedures, a plaintiff
must file and serve proposed findings of fact that support his claims, along with any evidence
that supports the proposed findings. Since Myrick has not provided any proposed findings of
fact, and his affidavit in support does not set forth facts describing either the relief he seeks or
any justifications for such relief, his request must be DENIED. The denial, however, is without
prejudice. Should Myrick renew this motion, he must follow the required procedures and bear
in mind that to succeed in such a motion, he must also make the following showing: (1) a
likelihood of success on the merits of his case; (2) a lack of an adequate remedy at law; and (3)
an irreparable harm that will result if the injunction is not granted. Lambert v. Buss, 498 F.3d
446, 451 (7th Cir. 2001).
Entered this 18th day of September, 2018.
BY THE COURT:
/s/
WILLIAM M. CONLEY
District Judge